Back to Journals » ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research » Volume 11

Budget Impact Of Eltrombopag As First-Line Treatment For Severe Aplastic Anemia In The United States

Authors Tremblay G, Said Q, Roy AN, Cai B, Ashton Garib S, Hearnden J, Forsythe A

Received 7 August 2019

Accepted for publication 9 October 2019

Published 12 November 2019 Volume 2019:11 Pages 673—681

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S226323

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Dean Smith


Gabriel Tremblay,1 Qayyim Said,2 Anuja Nidumolu Roy,2 Beilei Cai,2 Shan Ashton Garib,1 Jaclyn Hearnden,1 Anna Forsythe1

1Purple Squirrel Economics, New York, NY, USA; 2Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA

Correspondence: Gabriel Tremblay
Purple Squirrel Economics, 4 Lexington Ave, Suite 15K, New York, NY 10010, USA
Tel +1 418 317 5627
Email gabrieltremblay@pshta.com

Background: Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare autoimmune condition resulting in low blood cell counts across lineages. Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) has demonstrated low response, toxicity, and risk of transformation. In a Phase I/II trial, the addition of eltrombopag to first-line IST increased response rates relative to an IST-only historical cohort.
Methods: A model was developed to estimate the budget impact of treating SAA with eltrombopag-based therapy from a US private healthcare system perspective. A simulated cohort of newly diagnosed SAA patients based on the total US population received 6 months of IST ± eltrombopag and were followed for 1 year, with mutually exclusive patient cohorts entering in years 1, 2, and 3. The model assessed the budget impact of first-year treatment for each cohort without considering subsequent years. At 6 months, responders in either arm received maintenance therapy (low-dose cyclosporine), and non-responders received 6 months of second-line eltrombopag monotherapy. Costs considered included first-line, maintenance, and second-line therapy, administration, routine care, mortality, and adverse events (AEs). All cost data were reported in 2018 US dollars.
Results: The annual incidence of aplastic anemia was 0.000234%, with 83.8% of cases assumed to be SAA. Based on trial data, 94% of patients receiving eltrombopag and IST responded versus 66% of patients receiving IST, with a 0.3% reduction in the annual risk of mortality for the eltrombopag + IST group. Use of first-line eltrombopag in a model SAA population based on the total US population increased overall costs by $50 million over 3 years. First-line drug costs accounted for an increase of $69 million, while improved response produced $19 million in secondary therapy cost savings. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the analysis.
Conclusion: High response rates combined with reduced rescue medication use and mortality in patients treated with eltrombopag and IST mediated higher medication costs.

Keywords: budget impact analysis, costs, eltrombopag, severe aplastic anemia, thrombopoietin receptor agonist, United States


Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]