Back to Journals » Drug Design, Development and Therapy » Volume 13

Bioequivalence of paclitaxel protein-bound particles in patients with breast cancer: determining total and unbound paclitaxel in plasma by rapid equilibrium dialysis and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Authors Li J, Li W, Dai X, Zhong D, Ding Y, Chen X

Received 7 January 2019

Accepted for publication 23 March 2019

Published 20 May 2019 Volume 2019:13 Pages 1739—1749

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S200679

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Andrew Yee

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Cristiana Tanase


Junling Li,1 Wei Li,2 Xiaojian Dai,2 Dafang Zhong,2 Yaping Ding,1 Xiaoyan Chen2

1College of Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

Background and objective: Paclitaxel protein-bound particles for injectable suspension (nab-paclitaxel) showed many advantages in safety, effectiveness, and convenience. Different from conventional formulations, the bioequivalence evaluation of nab-paclitaxel formulations requires to determine the total amount of paclitaxel in plasma and the unbound paclitaxel to reflect their in vivo disposition. This study aimed to develop an analytical method to quantify the total and unbound paclitaxel in plasma and evaluate the bioequivalence of two formulations of nab-paclitaxel in patients with breast cancer.
Materials and methods: An open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study was completed among 24 Chinese patients with breast cancer. The patients were randomized to receive either the test formulation on cycle 1 day 1 and after 21 days in cycle 2 day 1 by the reference formulation (Abraxane®), or vice versa. Rapid equilibrium dialysis was adopted to separate the unbound paclitaxel in human plasma. Total and unbound paclitaxel concentrations were measured by the validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry methods over the range of 5.00–15,000 and 0.200–200 ng/mL, respectively. The bioequivalence of the test formulation to the reference formulation was assessed using the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines.
Results: All the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios fell within the predetermined acceptance range. The 90% CIs for the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) from 0 h to 72 h (AUC0–t), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0–∞), and peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) for total paclitaxel were 92.03%–98.05%, 91.98%–99.37%, and 91.37%–99.36%, respectively. The 90% CIs of AUC0–t, AUC0–∞, and Cmax for unbound paclitaxel were 86.77%–97.88%, 86.81%–97.88%, and 87.70%–98.86%, respectively.
Conclusion: Bioequivalence between the two nab-paclitaxel formulations was confirmed for total and unbound paclitaxel at the studied dose regimen.

Keywords: nab-paclitaxel, bioequivalence, rapid equilibrium dialysis, unbound fraction, pharmacokinetics

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]