Berberine-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers Enhance the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

Introduction

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a relapsing intestinal inflammatory disease with unknown etiology characterized by continuous diffuse inflammation and damage to the intestinal mucosal barrier.^1,2 The typical age of onset is between 20 and 39 years.³ The incidence of UC is increasing annually worldwide, especially in Europe.⁴ Drugs used to treat UC, including immunosuppressants, biological agents, glucocorticoids, amino acids, and salicylic acid, have side effects, and patient compliance is poor due to the chronic nature of the disease.⁵ Recent studies have shown that natural products may be promising alternative agents for treatment of colitis.^6–9 However, many natural drugs are poorly soluble, which limits absorption, and results in low bioavailability.¹⁰ New formulations of natural products to improve absorption and bioavailability have received increasing interest.^11,12

Berberine (BBR) is the principal isoquinoline alkaloidal constituent of the stems and roots of various berberis species such as B. aristata, B. petiolaris and B. vulgaris.¹³ Studies have shown that BBR exerts anti-inflammatory,¹⁴ anti-oxidative,¹⁵ and anti-hyperglycemic effects, and has anti-bacterial properties associated with improvement of diarrhea and other gastrointestinal infections.¹⁶ However, BBR suffers from poor aqueous solubility, poor absorption by the gastrointestinal tract, and low bioavailability (about 5%). Therefore, BBR must be administered at very high concentrations to achieve efficacy, which results in increased risk of adverse drug reactions.¹⁷

Recent studies have focused on nanocrystallization of natural products.^18–20 Lipid-based nanoparticles, which include solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), are excellent drug delivery systems for lipophilic pharmaceuticals.^21–23 Nanostructured lipid carriers share the benefits of SLNs, such as stability, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and scalability, but allow for higher drug-loading capacity than SLNs due to greater structural disorder and reduced leakage of encapsulated drugs during storage.²⁴

In this study, we developed BBR-loaded NLCs (BBR-NLCs) using high-pressure homogenization, and tested the physical features of this formulation. We then evaluated biocompatibility and drug uptake in vivo and in vitro. Finally, we evaluated the efficacy of BBR-NLCs for treatment of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice and explored the anti-inflammatory mechanisms of BBR-NLCs using Raw264.7 cells.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of NLCs Containing BBR

BBR-NLCs were prepared using high-pressure homogenization. Briefly, 2.5% glyceryl behenate (Compritol 888 ATO, GATTEFOSSE SAS, France) and 2.0% olive oil (Aladdin, China) were mixed and heated to about 75 °C (above the melting point). Then, 1.0% BBR powder (95%, Yuanye Bio-Technology, Shanghai, China), 2.0% cremophor EL (Kolliphor EL, BASF Corp., Germany), and 2.5% d-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS, BASF Corp., Germany) were dissolved in distilled water and heated to about 75 °C. The aqueous phase was dispersed into melted lipid solution, then homogenized at 5,000 rpm for 15 minutes (IKA T18 basic ULTRA-TURRAX^®, Germany). This pre-mix was passed through a high-pressure homogenizer (APV-2000, Denmark) for 10 cycles at 500 bar and 20 cycles at 1,500 bar.

Characterization of BBR-NLCs

Diluted BBR-NLC (1:100) was placed on mica plates. After 10 min, the plates were analyzed using atomic force microscopy (AFM), and data were collected at room temperature using a Multimode-Nanoscope V (Veeco, USA) operated in ScanAsyst mode with an etched silicon probe (RTesp-Bruker; cantilever resonance frequency: 150 kHz, Force constant: 5 N/m, scan rates: 1 Hz).²⁵

The BBR-NLCs were diluted 100-fold, then analyzed using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK) to determine average particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential. Each analysis was performed in triplicate.

Nanostructured lipid carriers containing BBR were diluted 100-fold, and free drug was removed using a dialysis tube.²⁶ Then, BBR was extracted from the NLCs by addition of methanol. The drug content was determined at 263 nm using UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Seisakusho, Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). The experiment was performed in triplicate. The entrapment efficiency (EE) and drug loading (DL) were calculated using the following equation:

All procedures were executed based on methods described by Zhang.²⁷ Briefly, adding 0.5 g of BBR or BBR-NLCs to 500 mL of simulated gastric juice (pH = 1.2) and stimulated intestinal juice (pH = 7.5) at 36 ± 0.5°C while stirring constantly at 50 rpm. At pre-determined time intervals, suitable aliquots were withdrawn, filtered with 0.45 μm pore size syringe filters, and assayed by above HPLC method. The withdrawn samples were replaced by equal volumes of fresh dissolution medium maintained at the same temperature.

Cell Lines and Cultures

The RAW264.7 and Caco-2 cells were purchased from the Cell Culture Center of the Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) and maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Gibco BRL, Life Technologies, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, New York, USA), 1% nonessential amino acids (Gibco BRL, Life Technologies, USA) (only Caco-2 cells), and 100 U/mL of penicillin and 100 μg/mL of streptomycin, and were cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO₂ atmosphere.

Biocompatibility Assays

Biocompatibility of BBR-NLCs was evaluated in vivo using a mouse model of colitis (Figure 1A). Toxicity was evaluated in vivo for 4 days following oral administration of blank NLCs, free BBR, and BBR-NLCs (20 mg/Kg). Six mice were assessed in each group. Major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney) were collected for analysis. Pathological changes were observed using a microscope.

Figure 1 Uptake of BBR and BBR-NLCs into RAW264.7 and Caco-2 cells was evaluated for 0.5, 1, and 2 h. Notes: Flow cytometry was used to quantify the fluorescence intensity. For all experiments, n = 3.

Cellular Uptake Study

Caco-2 cells and RAW 264.7 cells (20×10⁵ cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates. On the second day, cells were incubated with BBR and BBR-NLCs (5 μg/mL) for 0.5, 1, or 2 h. The cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, then washed three times with cold PBS. Intracellular localization of BBR was visualized using a fluorescence microscope.

Caco-2 cells and RAW 264.7 cells (4×10⁶ cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates. On the next day, the cells were treated with BBR or BBR-NLCs (5 μg/mL) for 0.5, 1, or 2 h, then harvested for flow cytometry analysis.

Colitis Model Construction and Treatment Conditions

Wild-type Balb/c mice were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Southern Medical University (Certificate SCXK2016‐0041). Thirty mice (weight, 22 ± 2 g) were randomly divided into the following five groups: control, DSS, NLCs, free BBR, and BBR-NLCs (n = 6 in each group).

All animal procedures were approved by the Committee on Animals of the Jinan University. All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Animal of the Jinan University.

Acute colitis was induced as described previously.²⁸ Each group (except the control group) was continuously provided 2.5% DSS (molecular mass, 36–50 kDa; MP Biomedicals, Solon, Ohio, USA) in drinking water for 7 days, NLCs, free BBR, and BBR-NLCs were administered orally began following three days of drinking 2.5% DSS in water (Figure 1A). Mice in the control group received regular drinking water throughout the experiment. Drinking water containing 2.5% DSS was replaced every other day.

Disease Activity Index (DAI)

Body weight, stool characteristics, and blood in the stool were recorded daily and averaged to determine DAI. Each parameter was scored as follows: body weight loss (0, <1%; 1, 1–5%; 2, 5–10%; 3, 10–15%; 4, >15%), the presence or absence of blood in the feces (0, negative; 2, hidden blood in stool; 4, bloody stool), and stool consistency (0, negative; 2, loose stools; 4, diarrhea).²⁹

Histological Score

Mice were sacrificed after drinking DSS for 7 days. The colons were collected, measured for length, and then washed with normal saline. The middle segments of the colons were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Beyotime biotechnology, China) for 24 h, embedded in paraffin, sectioned into 4-μm slices, then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Severity of inflammation was evaluated using a previously described scoring system.³⁰

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Measurement

The distal colons were weighed and homogenized in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. Myeloperoxidase activity was measured in the supernatant using an MPO activity assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Biochemical Engineering, Nanjing, China). Myeloperoxidase activity was expressed as U/mg protein.³¹

Immunofluorescence Analyses

To study tight junction (TJ) proteins, colon sections were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 24 h, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, blocked with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 30 min, then incubated with a primary antibody against zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) (1:50; eBioscience, San Diego, USA) overnight at 4°C. After washing 3 times with PBS (5 min each time), the monolayer was incubated with Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies in the dark for 1 h. The cells were then stained with 4ʹ, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Beyotime biotechnology, China) in the dark for 10 min, then washed 3 times. Cells on glass coverslips were mounted onto clean glass slides using fluorescence mounting media, and the cells were visualized using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan). Fluorescence intensity was determined using Image J 1.51 software.

We evaluated influence of BBR on nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) nuclear translocation as described by Shan Han, with some modifications.³² RAW264.7 cells were seeded in confocal dishes at a density of 1.5×10⁵ cells/well and allowed to adsorb overnight. Cells were pretreated with BBR or BBR-NLCs (5 μg/mL) for 2 h, then stimulated with 100 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 6 h. The cells were fixed, blocked, then incubated with anti-NF-κB p65 antibody (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) overnight at 4°C. Then, the cells were incubated with AlexaFluor 594 secondary antibody for 1 h. Nuclei were stained with DAPI and visualized using a confocal microscope (LSM880; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

Quantitative Real-Time PCR to Determine the Expression of Inflammatory Substances

After incubation with or without 2% DSS for 48 h, cells were washed with 1X PBS, and total RNA was isolated with TRIzol Reagent (TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing, China). Complementary DNA was reverse transcribed using an IScript Advanced cDNA synthesis kit. Real-time PCR was performed using a Bio-Rad Real-Time PCR System with SYBR Green PCR Master Mix. Specific primers were synthesized by Shanghai Shenggong Biotechnology (Shanghai, China) (Table 1). The following thermal parameters were used for PCR: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of amplification at 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 1 min.

Table 1 Quantitative Real-Time PCR Primer Sequence

Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7 software (San Diego, CA, USA). Data among groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Characterization of BBR-NLCs

Nanostructured lipid carriers with a BBR concentration of 1 mg/mL were successfully prepared using high-pressure homogenization. As shown in Figure 2A, analysis of BBR-NLCs using AFM analysis resulted in 3D images and particle size determination (about 100 nm). Previous studies have shown that the deposited SLN on mica plates would be flattened slightly, likewise, the size of BBR-NLCs obtained from AFM would be greater than the true.³³ Results obtained from a Malvern ZetaSizer showed that the average particle size, PDI, zeta potential, drug loading and entrapment efficiency of BBR-NLCs were 63.96± 0.31 nm, 0.29 ± 0.01, +3.16 ± 0.05 mV, 6.00±0.09% and 101.97±6.34%, respectively (Figure 2B, Table 2). Dissolution profiles of BBR and BBR-NLCs in simulated gastric and intestinal juices are displayed in Figure 3. The dissolution profile of the BBR-NLCs showed that 11.31% of the drug had been released in 2 h, compared to 39.11% of the free BBR in simulated gastric fluid. In addition, the dissolution profile of the BBR-NLCs showed that 53.37% of the drug had been released in 4 h, compared to 73.39% of the free BBR in simulated intestinal fluid. A higher dissolution rate of BBR-NLCs was obtained in simulated intestinal fluid showed the nanostructured lipid carriers delivery system has great potential to develop as pH sensitive drug delivery systems, enhance the release of nano-drug at site of action.^34,35 These results indicated that BBR-NLCs were of appropriate quality for the intended use in this study.

Table 2 Summary of Characterization of BBR-NLCs

Figure 2 Characterization of BBR-NLCs. Note: (A) AFM image and (B) size distribution.

Figure 3 Dissolution profiles of BBR and BBR-NLCs. Note: (A) In simulated gastric juice; (B) in simulated intestinal juice.

Evaluation of BBR-NLCs Biocompatibility

We assessed the toxicity of BBR-NLCs in vivo. Normal mice were orally administered BBR-NLCs for 4 days. In Figure 4, three oral administration groups (NLCs, BBR and BBR-NLCs) are compared with control group, respectively. We determined no obvious toxicity of the three oral administration groups in vivo through the pathological results of heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney.

Figure 4 Hematoxylin and eosin staining of histological sections were used to assess the toxicity of BBR-NLCs toward major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney).

Evaluation of in vitro Cellular Uptake

Uptake of BBR-NLCs was evaluated in RAW264.7 and Caco-2 cells using fluorescence microscopy. Each cell line was treated with equivalent concentrations of free BBR and BBR-NLCs for 0.5, 1, and 2 h. Green fluorescence indicated BBR uptake. As shown in Figure 5, overlays of the two acquired channels showed the distribution of BBR in the nucleus and cytoplasm. Stronger fluorescence was observed in RAW264.7 cells in response to BBR-NLCs (Figure 5B, D and F) than that in response to BBR (Figure 5A, C and E). Similar results were observed in Caco-2 cells, in which BBR-NLCs were taken up to a greater extent than free BBR (Figure 5G–L). These findings were consistent with the previous observation that small molecules mainly diffuse into cells, while uptake of nanocarriers occurs through endocytosis.³⁶

Figure 5 Uptake of berberine (BBR) and BBR-NLCs into RAW264.7 and Caco-2 cells were evaluated for 0.5 (A, B, G, H), 1 (C, D, I, J), and 2 h (E, F, K, L). Notes: The cell outline in each plane was determined using bright field imaging. BBR fluoresces (green channel), which allowed for tracking without modification of the drug. For all experiments, n = 3, and the scale bar = 100 µm.

To verify the qualitative results, intracellular BBR content was quantified using flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 1, free BBR and BBR-NLCs were incubated with RAW 264.7 cells and Caco-2 cells for 0.5, 1, and 2 h. The results showed that BBR-NLCs were internalized to a greater extent than free BBR in RAW 264.7 and Caco-2 cells.

BBR-NLCs Attenuated DSS-Induced Acute Colitis

In this study, the protective effects of BBR and BBR-NLCs were evaluated in DSS-induced colitis model. Studies have shown that DSS breaks down the epithelial barrier to induce UC, which results in weight loss, diarrhea, occult blood in stools, piloerection, anemia, and eventually death.³⁷ Mice were sacrificed on the eighth day, and the severity of inflammation was assessed using DAI, colon length, and macro-level histology. As shown in Figure 6B, DSS resulted in increased DAI, which correlated with development of UC. Oral administration of NLCs (0.55±0.34), free BBR (0.40±0.15), and BBR-NLCs (0.28±0.14) significantly attenuated diarrhea and occult blood compared to the DSS group (1.11±0.17). Furthermore, each treatment group blocked colon shortening and spleen swelling caused by DSS (Figure 6C and J). No differences in organ indices were found for the heart, liver, lung, and kidney among the groups (Figure 6E–I). Myeloperoxidase activity was lower in the free BBR group and BBR-NLCs group than that in the DSS group (Figure 6D). Treatment with BBR-NLCs provided more potent protective effects against UC than free BBR, which agreed with the in vitro uptake result in this study.

Figure 6 Treatment with BBR-NLCs alleviated symptoms of DSS-induced experimental colitis in mice. Notes: (A) Experimental protocol for DSS-induced colitis in mice. (B) Determination of DAI. (C) Representative colon length in each group. (D) Statistical analysis of colon length. (E) Colon MPO activity. (F) Heart weight index. (G) Liver weight index. (H) Kidney weight index. (I) Lung weight index. (J) Spleen weight index. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 compared with the control group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the DSS group.

Histological Assessment of Colon Tissues

The histological characteristics of the colons of mice with DSS-induced colitis were assessed using H&E staining. Representative results and microscopic scores are summarized in Figure 7. Inflammatory cell infiltration, edema, and changes in mucosal structure were observed in the DSS group. Treatment with NLCs, BBR, and BBR-NLCs ameliorated DSS-induced damage to crypt structures and severe inflammation, and this protective effect was most pronounced in response to treatment with BBR-NLCs.

Figure 7 Representative colon tissue sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin visualized using a microscope. Notes: (A) control; (B) DSS; (C) NLCs; (D) BBR; (E) BBR-NLCs. (F) Colitis histological score for each group. The scale bar = 1000 µm. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). ###P < 0.001 compared with the control group; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the DSS group.

Treatment with BBR-NLCs Blocked DSS-Induced ZO-1 Disruption

Immunofluorescence was used to evaluate the expression of ZO-1 (Figure 8). Treatment with free BBR and BBR-NLCs reversed DSS-induced decreases in the expression of ZO-1. These results showed that BBR and BBR-NLCs protected intestinal barrier function, and BBR-NLCs exerted more potent protective effects.

Figure 8 Representative images of ZO-1 immunofluorescence. Notes: (A) Control; (B) DSS; (C) NLCs; (D) BBR; (E) BBR-NLCs. The tight junction protein ZO-1 was stained red, and nuclei were counterstained blue. The scale bar = 200 µm.

Inhibition of Colon Inflammation by BBR-NLCs

The expression levels of inflammatory mediators in the colon were measured to evaluate the protective effects of BBR-NLCs against DSS-induced UC (Figure 9). The expression levels of the pro-inflammatory genes interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6), matrix metalloprotein 9 (MMP-9), chemokine (C-X3-C motif) receptor 1 (CX₃CR1), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) were increased in the DSS group compared to those in the control group. Treatment with free BBR and BBR-NLCs significantly inhibited DSS-induced increases in expression of inflammatory mediators, and BBR-NLCs induced a more potent protective effect than free BBR.

Figure 9 Suppression of mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory mediators in colon tissues in response to BBR and BBR-NLCs in mice with DSS-induced colitis in mice. Notes: (A) IL-1β; (B) IL-6; (C) MMP-9; (D) CX3CR1; (E) COX-2; and (E) TERT. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). #P<0.05, ##P<0.01, ###P < 0.001 compared with the control group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared the DSS group.

BBR-NLCs Suppressed LPS-Induced NF-κB Nuclear Translocation

Previous studies have shown that NF-κB is a key mediator of pro-inflammatory gene transcription.³⁸ Inactive NF-κB is bound to IκBα in the cytoplasm. Stimulation with LPS results in phosphorylation and degradation of IκBα, which allows nuclear translocation of NF-κB.³⁹ Immunofluorescence analyses indicated that LPS successfully induced translocation of NF-κB from cytoplasm to nucleus (Figure 10B), and that free BBR and BBR-NLCs significantly inhibited LPS-induced nuclear translocation of NF-κB (Figure 10C and D). In addition, treatment with BBR-NLCs resulted in levels of nuclear NF-κB similar to those in the control group (Figure 10A).

Figure 10 Berberine (BBR)-NLCs blocked LPS-induced NF-κB nuclear translocation. Notes: (A) Untreated RAW264.7 cells. (B) RAW264.7 cells treated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 6 h. (C) RAW264.7 cells pretreated with BBR (5 μg/mL) for 2 h, then treated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 6 h. (D) RAW264.7 cells pretreated with BBR-NLCs (5 μg/mL) for 2 h, then treated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 6 h. The translocation of NF-κB was determined using immunofluorescence. For all experiments, n = 3, and the scale bar = 20 µm.

Discussion

Conventional drugs used to treat UC exhibit limited efficacy or induce severe adverse reactions.⁵ Increasing numbers of studies have shown that natural products have great potential for the treatment of UC.^40,41 However, low bioavailability has limited the clinical use of natural products.⁴² It is reported that pharmacists have applied nano-delivery systems to the delivery of natural drugs and developed many novel drug forms for the inflammatory bowel disease, skin diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases.^43–45

In this study, we prepared BBR-NLCs using high-pressure homogenization to improve uptake of BBR and compared the anti-inflammatory effects of BBR-NLCs with those of free BBR. The characteristics of BBR-NLCs are summarized in Figure 2 and Table 2. The prepared BBR-NLCs ranged from 30 nm to 200 nm in size, which was optimal for cellular uptake.⁴⁶ Evaluation of biocompatibility of BBR-NLCs showed no apparent toxicity against major organs in vivo, which showed that BBR-NLCs were safe for use to treat UC.⁴⁷ Studies have shown that nanoscale drugs were taken up to a greater extent than free drugs.^48,49 In our uptake study, BBR-NLCs showed superior uptake compared with free BBR (Figures 1 and 5). In addition, qualitative analysis of uptake in vitro showed that BBR was distributed in the cytoplasm and nucleus, which was consistent with the findings of a study by Serafim.⁵⁰ Treatment with BBR-NLCs markedly improved DAI, colon length, MPO activity, spleen swelling, and histological characteristics of mice with DSS-induced UC, and this effect was stronger than that induced by free BBR (Figures 6 and 7). These results agreed with those from a study by Juntao Yin et al that showed that BBR-loaded NLCs enhanced the anti-diabetic activity of BBR.⁵¹ These results were consistent with the advantages of nanostructured lipid carriers for drug delivery. Furthermore, treatment with nanostructured lipid carriers without drug also mitigated UC. Further investigation found that olive oil, a component of nanostructured lipid carriers, reduced inflammation in rats with DSS-induced colitis.⁵² Therefore, olive oil may function as a drug delivery carrier and as an auxiliary therapeutic agent.

The mechanisms of the protective effects of BBR and BBR-NLCs against UC were investigated. BBR and BBR-NLCs inhibited pro-inflammatory gene expression (IL-1β, IL-6, COX-2, and TERT), and neutrophilic chemotaxis (MMP-9 and CX3CR1). Each of the pro-inflammatory genes evaluated in this study was associated with the NF-κB pathway.^53–56 Furthermore, BBR and BBR-NLCs inhibited translocation of NF-κB from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Moreover, colon sections showed that the intestinal mucosal structure remained intact following treatment with BBR-NLCs. Immunofluorescence was used to evaluate the tight junction protein ZO-1 in colon tissue. The results showed that BBR-NLCs protected against UC-induced decreases in ZO-1 expression to a greater extent than free BBR. Our results showed that BBR-NLCs protected against UC to a greater extent than free BBR through inhibition of the NF-κB pathway. Preparation of BBR-NLCs and the associated protective mechanisms against UC are summarized in Figure 11.

Figure 11 Schematic of preparation and functional mechanisms of BBR-NLCs. Note: Image produced using BioRender.

Conclusion

In this study, we developed a novel method for preparation of BBR-NLCs. We showed that BBR-NLCs protected against inflammation associated with DSS-induced UC in mice through inhibition of the NF-κB pathway, which resulted in protection of the colon mucosa. These findings showed that BBR-NLCs may have potential as novel therapeutic agents for treatment of UC.