Back to Journals » Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy » Volume 1 » Default

Astragalus-containing Chinese herbal combinations for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 65 clinical trials enrolling 4751 patients

Authors Dugoua JJ, Wu P, Seely D, Eyawo O, Mills E

Published 9 July 2010 Volume 2010:1(Default) Pages 85—100

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S7780

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Jean Jacques Dugoua1, Ping Wu2, Dugald Seely3, Oghenowede Eyawo4, Edward Mills4,5

1Graduate Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; 2Shanghai Hospital #4, Shanghai, China; 3Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine; 4Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada; 5Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of death. Interventions to reduce mortality in patients with NSCLC represent a patient-important field of research. Little is known about interventions used outside the Western world for NSCLC. One intervention widely used in Asia is astragalus-based herbal preparations.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of all published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating astragalus-based herbal preparations in NSCLC patients. We searched independently, in duplicate, 6 English language electronic databases and 2 Chinese-language databases. We abstracted data independently, in duplicate on studies reporting of methods, survival outcomes, tumor responses, and performance score responses. We applied a random-effects meta-analysis and report outcomes as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: We included 65 RCTs enrolling 4751 patients. All trials included the herbal preparations plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. We pooled 7 studies (n = 529) reporting on survival at 6 months and found a pooled RR of 0.54 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.65, P ≤ 0.0001). We included 20 trials in (n = 1520) for survival at 12 months and found a pooled RR of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.79, P ≤ 0.0001). This effect was consistent at 24 and 36 months. When we applied a composite endpoint of any tumor treatment response we pooled data from 57 trials and found a pooled RR of 1.35 in favor of herbal treatment (95% CI, 1.26 to 1.44, P ≤ 0.0001). Statistical heterogeneity was low across trials.

Limitations: The quality of reporting the RCTs was generally poor. There is also reason to believe that studies reported as randomized may not be.
Conclusions: We found a large treatment effect of adding astragalus-based herbal treatment to standard chemotherapy regimens. There is a pressing need for validation of these findings in well-conducted RCTs in a Western setting.

Keywords: astralagus, non-small-cell lung cancer, herbal preparations

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]