Association of mitochondrial DNA copy number with self-rated health status
Authors Takahashi PY, Jenkins GD, Welkie BP, McDonnell SK, Evans JM, Cerhan JR, Olson JE, Thibodeau SN, Cicek MS, Ryu E
Received 8 March 2018
Accepted for publication 16 May 2018
Published 25 October 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 121—127
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Cristina Weinberg
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Martin H. Maurer
Paul Y Takahashi,1 Gregory D Jenkins,2 Benjamin P Welkie,2 Shannon K McDonnell,2 Jared M Evans,2 James R Cerhan,2 Janet E Olson,2 Stephen N Thibodeau,3 Mine S Cicek,3 Euijung Ryu2
1Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, 2Department of Health Sciences Research, 3Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
Purpose: In aging adults, mitochondrial dysfunction may be an important contributor. We evaluated the association between mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number, which is a biomarker for mitochondrial function, and self-rated health status.
Patients and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients enrolled within the Mayo Clinic Biobank. We utilized the questionnaire and sequence data from 944 patients. We examined the association between mtDNA copy number and self-rated health status with 3 collapsed categories for the latter variable (excellent/very good, good, and fair/poor). For analysis, we used proportional odds models after log-transforming mtDNA copy number, and we adjusted for age and sex.
Results: We found the median age at enrollment was 61 years (25th–75th percentile: 51–71), and 64% reported excellent or very good health, 31% reported good health, and 6% reported fair/poor health. Overall, the median mtDNA copy number was 88.9 (25th–75th percentile: 77.6–101.1). Higher mtDNA copy number was found for subjects reporting better self-rated health status after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidity burden (OR =2.3 [95% CI: 1.2–4.5] for having better self-rated health for a one-unit increase in log-transformed mtDNA copy number).
Conclusion: We found that a higher mtDNA copy number is associated with better self-rated health status after adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidity burden. The current study implies that mtDNA copy number may serve as a biomarker for self-reported health. Further studies, potentially including cohort studies, may be required.
Keywords: mitochondrial DNA copy number, self-rated health, personalized medicine
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]