Assessment of current clinical practices for major depression in Japan using a web-based questionnaire
Authors Hori H, Yamato K
Received 29 May 2019
Accepted for publication 6 August 2019
Published 1 October 2019 Volume 2019:15 Pages 2821—2832
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Taro Kishi
Hikaru Hori,1 Kentaro Yamato2
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan; 2JPBU Department of Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence: Kentaro Yamato
JPBU Department of Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 1-1 Nihonbashi-honcho 2-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8668, Japan
Tel +81 33 278 3244
Fax +81 33 278 2925
Email [email protected]
Purpose: To investigate the current clinical practice of Japanese physicians in the diagnosis and management of major depression (major depressive disorder [MDD]).
Patients and methods: Japanese physicians specializing in psychiatry or psychosomatic medicine in the medical database of Nihon Ultmarc Inc. (Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan), who had treated ≥30 patients with MDD in the past month were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire from January 15 to 29, 2018. The questionnaire was comprised of 28 questions pertaining to the physician’s background, the criteria and tools used to diagnose MDD during physician–patient consultation, and actual and preferred duration of physician–patient consultation. Responses were given as single answer numerical values or as multiple-choice answers.
Results: From the 518 physicians invited to participate, 340 completed questionnaires were analyzed. Respondents were predominantly male (90%), hospital based (73%), affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry (95%), and members of the Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology (87%). The majority of physicians (84%) agreed that “improvement of cognitive dysfunction caused by major depression is an important factor for patients to return to work” was the most challenging aspect of MDD diagnosis and management. Moreover, 83% of physicians conducted psychological assessments using a cognition evaluation test with most of their patients at the time of MDD diagnosis; the most commonly used tool was the Hasegawa Dementia Scale-Revised. Both hospital-based physicians and general practitioners would prefer to have longer consultations with their patients.
Conclusion: Physicians acknowledge the importance of the assessment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with MDD. However, most physicians would prefer to have longer consultation times with their patients for the diagnosis of MDD. In the future, it may be useful to introduce digital tools (eg, THINC-it®) for the initial screening of cognitive dysfunction.
Keywords: Japan, survey, diagnosis, management, major depression disorder
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]