Back to Journals » Journal of Pain Research » Volume 2

Long-term outcomes of anthroposophic therapy for chronic low back pain: A two-year follow-up analysis

Authors Hamre H, Witt CM, Kienle GS, Glockmann A, Ziegler R, Willich SN, Kiene H

Published 25 June 2009 Volume 2009:2 Pages 75—85

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S5922

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Harald J Hamre1, Claudia M Witt2, Gunver S Kienle1, Anja Glockmann1, Renatus Ziegler3, Stefan N Willich2,  Helmut Kiene1

1Institute for Applied Epistemology and Medical Methodology, Freiburg, Germany; 2Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics,  Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany; 3Society for Cancer Research, Arlesheim, Switzerland

Background: Anthroposophic treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP) includes special artistic and physical therapies and special medications. In a previously published prospective cohort study, anthroposophic treatment for chronic LBP was associated with improvements of pain, back function, and quality of life at 12-month follow-up. These improvements were at least comparable to improvements in a control group receiving conventional care. We conducted a two-year follow-up analysis of the anthroposophic therapy group with a larger sample size.

Methods: Seventy-five consecutive adult outpatients in Germany, starting anthroposophic treatment for discogenic or non-specific LBP of ≥6 weeks’ duration participated in a prospective cohort study. Main outcomes were Hanover Functional Ability Questionnaire (HFAQ; 0–100), LBP Rating Scale Pain Score (LBPRS; 0–100), Symptom Score (0–10), and SF-36 after 24 months.

Results: Eighty-five percent of patients were women. Mean age was 49.0 years. From baseline to 24-month follow-up all outcomes improved significantly; average improvements were: HFAQ 11.1 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.5–16.6; p < 0.001), LBPRS 8.7 (95% CI: 4.4–13.0; p < 0.001), Symptom Score 2.0 (95% CI: 1.3–2.8; p < 0.001), SF-36 Physical Component Summary 6.0 (95% CI: 2.9–9.1; p < 0.001), and SF-36 Mental Component Summary 4.0 (95% CI: 1.1–6.8; p = 0.007).

Conclusion: Patients with chronic LBP receiving anthroposophic treatment had sustained improvements of symptoms, back function, and quality of life, suggesting that larger multicenter rigorous studies may be worthwhile.

Keywords: anthroposophy, drug therapy, eurythmy therapy, low back pain, follow-up studies

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF] 

 

Other articles by this author:

Anthroposophic therapy for attention deficit hyperactivity: A two-year prospective study in outpatients

Harald J Hamre, Claudia M Witt, Gunver S Kienle, et al

International Journal of General Medicine 2010, 3:239-253

Published Date: 17 August 2010

Anthroposophic therapy for asthma: A two-year prospective cohort study in routine outpatient settings

Harald J Hamre, Claudia M Witt, Gunver S Kienle, et al

Journal of Asthma and Allergy 2009, 2:111-128

Published Date: 24 November 2009

Readers of this article also read:

Current perspectives in stem cell research for knee cartilage repair

Orth P, Rey-Rico A, Venkatesan JK, Madry H, Cucchiarini M

Stem Cells and Cloning: Advances and Applications 2014, 7:1-17

Published Date: 16 January 2014

Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy

Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088

Published Date: 27 July 2012

Biomarkers for osteoarthritis: investigation, identification, and prognosis

Zhai G, Aref Eshghi E

Current Biomarker Findings 2012, 2:19-28

Published Date: 29 June 2012

Topical diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee

Niklas Schuelert, Fiona A Russell, Jason J McDougall

Orthopedic Research and Reviews 2011, 3:1-8

Published Date: 6 February 2011

Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection

Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711

Published Date: 14 July 2010