Back to Journals » Open Access Journal of Contraception » Volume 7

Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives

Authors Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell D

Received 29 September 2015

Accepted for publication 10 December 2015

Published 16 March 2016 Volume 2016:7 Pages 19—32


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Linfeng Wu

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Igal Wolman

Sam Rowlands,1 Emeka Oloto,2 David H Horwell3

1Centre of Postgraduate Medical Research and Education, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK; 2Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, UK; 3Spire Harpenden Hospital, Harpenden, UK

Abstract: Uterine perforation is an uncommon complication of intrauterine device insertion, with an incidence of one in 1,000 insertions. Perforation may be complete, with the device totally in the abdominal cavity, or partial, with the device to varying degrees within the uterine wall. Some studies show a positive association between lactation and perforation, but a causal relationship has not been established. Very rarely, a device may perforate into bowel or the urinary tract. Perforated intrauterine devices can generally be removed successfully at laparoscopy.

Keywords: uterine perforation, intrauterine device, intrauterine system

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]


Readers of this article also read:

Treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum with thalidomide in a myelodysplastic syndrome case

Malkan UY, Gunes G, Eliacik E, Haznedaroglu IC

International Medical Case Reports Journal 2016, 9:61-64

Published Date: 16 March 2016

Development and novel therapeutics in hepatocellular carcinoma: a review

Ingle PV, Samsudin SZ, Chan PQ, Ng MK, Heng LX, Yap SC, Chai ASH, Wong ASY

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2016, 12:445-455

Published Date: 16 March 2016

Study of knowledge and attitude among college-going students toward voluntary blood donation from north India

Mishra SK, Sachdev S, Marwaha N, Avasthi A

Journal of Blood Medicine 2016, 7:19-26

Published Date: 16 March 2016

The outcomes of intra-aortic balloon pump usage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 33 clinical trials and 18,889 patients

Fan ZG, Gao XF, Chen LW, Li XB, Shao MX, Ji Q, Zhu H, Ren YZ, Chen SL, Tian NL

Patient Preference and Adherence 2016, 10:297-312

Published Date: 16 March 2016

Contraception for women with diabetes: challenges and solutions

Robinson A, Nwolise C, Shawe J

Open Access Journal of Contraception 2016, 7:11-18

Published Date: 3 March 2016