Back to Browse Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 2

Patient’s compliance with allergen immunotherapy

Authors Cristoforo Incorvaia, Marina Mauro, Erminia Ridolo, Paola Puccinelli, Massimiliano Liuzzo, et al

Published 15 September 2008 Volume 2008:2 Pages 247—251


Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Cristoforo Incorvaia1, Marina Mauro2, Erminia Ridolo3, Paola Puccinelli4, Massimiliano Liuzzo4, Silvia Scurati4, Franco Frati4,5

1Allergy/Pulmonary rehabilitation Unit, ICP Hospital, Milan, Italy; 2Allergy Unit, Sant’Anna Hospital, Como, Italy; 3University Department of Clinical Sciences, Parma, Italy; 4Medical and Scientific Department, Stallergenes, Milan, Italy; 5Pediatrics, University Department of Medical and Surgical Specialty and Public Health, Perugia, Italy

Background: Allergen immunotherapy (IT) is an effective treatment of respiratory allergy, but requires strict rules of performance. This makes compliance particularly relevant, but thus far only a few studies have investigated this issue.

Methods: We reviewed all the available articles on compliance and adherence with IT in its different forms of administration, ie, subcutaneous (SCIT), sublingual (SLIT), and local nasal (LNIT).

Results: Early studies, when only SCIT was available, reported a low compliance, ranging from 45% to 60%, but the demanding schedules used, with very frequent injections, accounted for this outcome, as shown by patients’ recognition of inconvenience as the major cause of noncompliance. The most recent studies reported a good compliance, estimated in 75% to 90%, to both SCIT and SLIT, inconvenience remaining the major cause of noncompliance, followed by cost of the treatment. The only study addressing LNIT found a very poor compliance (27%), the major cause being the side effects, with repeated nasal reactions to the allergen extract.

Conclusions: Adequate education of patients and optimization of administration schedules, with fine balancing between dose effectiveness and cost, are the factors most likely to achieve further improvement of compliance with IT.

Keywords: allergen immunotherapy, subcutaneous, sublingual, local nasal, compliance, adherence

Download Article [PDF] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at:

Other articles by this author:

Effect of noninvasive mechanical ventilation in elderly patients with hypercapnic acute-on-chronic respiratory failure and a do-not-intubate order

Paolo Scarpazza, Cristoforo Incorvaia, Giuseppe di Franco, Stefania Raschi, Pierfranco Usai, et al

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2008, 3:797-801

Published Date: 5 December 2008

Current and future applications of the anti-IgE antibody omalizumab

Cristoforo Incorvaia, Marina Mauro, Gian Galeazzo Riario-Sforza, Franco Frati, Francesco Tarantini, Maurizio Caserini

Biologics: Targets and Therapy 2008, 2:67-73

Published Date: 7 March 2008

Impairment of small airways in COPD patients with frequent exacerbations and effects of treatment with tiotropium

Cristoforo Incorvaia, Gian Galeazzo Riario-Sforza, Chiara Pravettoni, Mona-Rita Yacoub, Franco Frati

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2008, 3:123-126

Published Date: 7 March 2008

Readers of this article also read:

Patients’ compliance with different administration routes for allergen immunotherapy in Germany

Egert-Schmidt AM, Kolbe JM, Mussler S, Thum-Oltmer S

Patient Preference and Adherence 2014, 8:1475-1481

Published Date: 24 October 2014

Satisfaction of hospitalized psychiatry patients: why should clinicians care?

Zendjidjian XY, Baumstarck K, Auquier P, Loundou A, Lançon C, Boyer L

Patient Preference and Adherence 2014, 8:575-583

Published Date: 25 April 2014

Patient education preferences in ophthalmic care

Rosdahl JA, Swamy L, Stinnett S, Muir KW

Patient Preference and Adherence 2014, 8:565-574

Published Date: 25 April 2014

Results of a human factors experiment of the usability and patient acceptance of a new autoinjector in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Schwarzenbach F, Dao Trong M, Grange L, Laurent PE, Abry H, Cotten J, Granger C

Patient Preference and Adherence 2014, 8:199-209

Published Date: 11 February 2014

Nationwide survey to evaluate medical utilization by patients with inguinal hernia and the risk of developing varicocele in Taiwan

Liu WL, Chen YA, Lai YW, Hsueh TY, Chen SS, Chiu AW

Patient Preference and Adherence 2014, 8:101-105

Published Date: 20 January 2014

Definitions, variants, and causes of nonadherence with medication: a challenge for tailored interventions

Hugtenburg JG, Timmers L, Elders PJM, Vervloet M, van Dijk L

Patient Preference and Adherence 2013, 7:675-682

Published Date: 10 July 2013

A literature review to explore the link between treatment satisfaction and adherence, compliance, and persistence

Dias Barbosa C, Balp M-M, Kulich K, Germain N, Rofail D

Patient Preference and Adherence 2012, 6:39-48

Published Date: 13 January 2012