Back to Browse Journals » Clinical Interventions in Aging » Volume 2 » Issue 2

Reducing the distance in distance-caregiving by technology innovation

Authors Lazelle E Benefield, Cornelia Beck

Published 15 July 2007 Volume 2007:2(2) Pages 267—272

Lazelle E Benefield1, Cornelia Beck2

1College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; 2Pat & Willard Walker Family Memory Research Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA

Abstract: Family caregivers are responsible for the home care of over 34 million older adults in the United States. For many, the elder family member lives more than an hour’s distance away. Distance caregiving is a growing alternative to more familiar models where: 1) the elder and the family caregiver(s) may reside in the same household; or 2) the family caregiver may live nearby but not in the same household as the elder. The distance caregiving model involves elders and their family caregivers who live at some distance, defined as more than a 60-minute commute, from one another. Evidence suggests that distance caregiving is a distinct phenomenon, differs substantially from on-site family caregiving, and requires additional assistance to support the physical, social, and contextual dimensions of the caregiving process. Technology-based assists could virtually connect the caregiver and elder and provide strong support that addresses the elder’s physical, social, cognitive, and/or sensory impairments. Therefore, in today’s era of high technology, it is surprising that so few affordable innovations are being marketed for distance caregiving. This article addresses distance caregiving, proposes the use of technology innovation to support caregiving, and suggests a research agenda to better inform policy decisions related to the unique needs of this situation.

Keywords: caregiving, family, distance, technology, elders

Download Article [PDF] 

Readers of this article also read:

The "Pulse Time Index of Norm" highly correlates with the left ventricular mass index in patients with arterial hypertension

Posokhov IN, Kulikova NN, Starchenkova IV, Grigoricheva EA, Evdokimov VV, Orlov AV, Rogoza AN

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2014, 10:139-144

Published Date: 19 March 2014

Group cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with generalized social anxiety disorder in Japan: outcomes at 1-year follow up and outcome predictors

Kawaguchi A, Watanabe N, Nakano Y, Ogawa S, Suzuki M, Kondo M, Furukawa TA, Akechi T

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2013, 9:267-275

Published Date: 20 February 2013

Efficacy and safety of donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Richard A Hansen, Gerald Gartlehner, Aaron P Webb, Laura C Morgan, Charity G Moore, Daniel E Jonas

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2008, 3:211-225

Published Date: 6 June 2008

Risedronate once monthly: a potential new regimen for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

María J Moro-Álvarez, Manuel Díaz-Curiel

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2008, 3:227-232

Published Date: 6 June 2008

Corrigendum

Dove Medical Press Editorial

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2008, 3:397-397

Published Date: 6 June 2008

The osteoporotic male: Overlooked and undermanaged?

Bruno Madeo, Lucia Zirilli, Giovanni Caffagni, Chiara Diazzi, Alessia Sanguanini, et al

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2007, 2:305-312

Published Date: 15 October 2007

Lower eyelid lengthening surgery targeting the posterior layer of the lower eyelid retractors via a transcutaneous approach

Hirohiko Kakizaki, Masahiro Zako, Masayoshi Iwaki

Clinical Ophthalmology 2007, 1:141-147

Published Date: 15 September 2007

Review of sitagliptin phosphate: a novel treatment for type 2 diabetes

Baptist Gallwitz

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2007, 3:203-210

Published Date: 15 May 2007

Aging and cosmetic enhancement

Roberta Honigman, David J Castle

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2006, 1:115-119

Published Date: 15 June 2006

The older driver: who is responsible? The state, the doctor, or the older driver?

Albert J Finestone 3

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2006, 1:6-10

Published Date: 15 March 2006