Back to Browse Journals » Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management » Volume 3 » Issue 4

How should we measure medication adherence in clinical trials and practice?

Authors Jeannie K Lee, Karen A Grace, Terri G Foster, Monica J Crawley, Goldina I Erowele, et al

Published 15 September 2007 Volume 2007:3(4) Pages 685—690

Jeannie K Lee, Karen A Grace, Terri G Foster, Monica J Crawley, Goldina I Erowele, Hazel J Sun, Phuong T Turner, Lance E Sullenberger, Allen J Taylor

Pharmacy and Cardiology Services, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA

Objective: To determine if simple adherence measures, such as twenty-four hour recall and refill history, are accurate for routine use, compared to more time-consuming measures such as pill counts.

Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting: Walter Reed Army Medical Center, a tertiary medical center in Washington.

Patients: Men and women >30 years old with known coronary heart disease and taking a statin medication.

Intervention: Clinical pharmacists met with patients for adherence assessments.

Main outcome measures: Adherence was measured by pill counts, twenty-four hour recall by patient, and refill history per computer record. Temporal changes in these adherence measures were assessed using general linear models for repeated measures.

Results: Adherence was consistently greater for the experimental agent than for the statin therapy (n = 148). Mean pill count adherence for statin drug was 78.7 ± 25.2% compared to 93.5 ± 11.6% (P < 0.001) for the study agent. Refill history and twenty-four hour recall inaccurately measured adherence when compared to pill counts. Adherence, as determined by pill count, for both experimental (P = 0.029) and statin therapy (P = 0.015) showed significant variability across time in general linear models. Neither refill history nor twenty-four hour recall was sensitive to temporal changes.

Conclusions: Twenty-four hour recall and refill history inaccurately measure medication adherence for both clinical trial and clinical practice pharmacotherapies. Further, these measures are insensitive to changes in adherence. For a single or multiple assessments across time, pill count more accurately measures medication adherence. Pill count should be the standard for monitoring medication adherence for both clinical trials and clinical practice.

Keywords: adherence, hyperlipidemia, niacin, pharmacist, pill count, simvastatin

Download Article [PDF] 

Readers of this article also read:

Prediction by data mining, of suicide attempts in Korean adolescents: a national study

Bae SM, Lee SA, Lee SH

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2015, 11:2367-2375

Published Date: 16 September 2015

Antitumor activity of SA12, a novel peptide, on SKBr-3 breast cancer cells via the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway

Yang L, Cui Y, Shen J, Lin F, Wang X, Long M, Wei J, Zhang H

Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015, 9:1319-1330

Published Date: 2 March 2015

Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation

Huang JH, Su QM, Yang J, Lv YH, He YC, Chen JC, Xu L, Wang K, Zheng QS

Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015, 9:305-312

Published Date: 7 January 2015

Seroprevalence of rubella-specific IgM and IgG antibodies among pregnant women seen in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria

Olajide OM, Aminu M, Randawa AJ, Adejo DS

International Journal of Women's Health 2015, 7:75-83

Published Date: 6 January 2015

Empirical comparison of four baseline covariate adjustment methods in analysis of continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials

Zhang S, Paul J, Nantha-Aree M, Buckley N, Shahzad U, Cheng J, DeBeer J, Winemaker M, Wismer D, Punthakee D, Avram V, Thabane L

Clinical Epidemiology 2014, 6:227-235

Published Date: 14 July 2014

Self-management in patients with psoriasis

Pathak SN, Scott PL, West C, Feldman SR

Psoriasis: Targets and Therapy 2014, 4:19-26

Published Date: 10 July 2014

Undivided attention improves postoperative anesthesia handover recall

Arenas A, Tabaac BJ, Fastovets G, Patil V

Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2014, 5:215-220

Published Date: 10 July 2014

Reovirus in cancer therapy: an evidence-based review

Clements D, Helson E, Gujar SA, Lee PWK

Oncolytic Virotherapy 2014, 3:69-82

Published Date: 9 July 2014