Back to Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 14

Adherence to Benzathine Penicillin G Secondary Prophylaxis and Its Determinants in Patients with Rheumatic Heart Disease at a Cardiac Center of an Ethiopian Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Authors Mekonen KK, Yismaw MB, Abiye AA, Tadesse TA

Received 13 November 2019

Accepted for publication 5 February 2020

Published 19 February 2020 Volume 2020:14 Pages 343—352

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S238423

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen


Kajela Kibirat Mekonen, Malede Berihun Yismaw, Alfoalem Araba Abiye, Tamrat Assefa Tadesse

Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Correspondence: Tamrat Assefa Tadesse P.O. Box: 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Email tamrat.assefa@aau.edu.et

Purpose: Benzathine penicillin G (BPG) monthly administration is the most effective method for secondary prophylaxis against acute rheumatic fever (ARF). BPG’s efficacy largely depends on adherence to treatment. This study was aimed at assessing adherence to BPG prophylaxis and its determinants among adult patients with rheumatic heart disease.
Patients and Methods: An institutional cross-sectional study design was used. One hundred and forty-five patients receiving monthly BPG at the Adult Cardiac Clinic of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) were interviewed. Their 1-year BPG prophylaxis administration record was also reviewed. The rate of adherence to BPG injection was determined by calculating the percentage of the administered drug from the total expected doses. Data were entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25. Both descriptive and logistic regression analyses were computed to describe different variables and assess factors associated with adherence, respectively. A p-value < 0.05 was used to declare association.
Results: Among a total of 145 study participants involved, the majority (76.6%) of them had been receiving BPG for the last 10 years. The average adherence rate to monthly BPG injection was 80.60% with a range of 0% to 100%. However, only 101 (69.7%) of participants were taking ≥ 80% of their prescribed monthly BPG prophylaxis doses. Study participants with informal education 1.10 (0.023– 46.96) and secondary school education 0.89 (0.10– 8.11) were more and less likely to adhere to BPG injection, respectively, when compared with those who attended higher education programs. The regression analysis showed patients who were not admitted to the hospital (AOR: 26.22; CI: 2.55– 269.70; p=0.006) and once admitted patients (AOR: 50.08; CI: 2.87– 873.77; p=0.007) were more likely to adhere to their BPG injections than those admitted twice or more. The study participants who waited until the next appointment were also less adherent (AOR: 0.02; CI: 0.00– 0.13; p=0.000) than those who went a few days later for receiving the missed/late dose.
Conclusion: The adherence rate to BPG injection among RHD patients was found to be high (80.60%). Patients’ admission status and their action on missed and/or late doses were found to be important determinants of adherence in this study.

Keywords: rheumatic heart disease, benzathine penicillin G, adherence rate, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]