Back to Journals » International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease » Volume 10 » Issue 1

A longitudinal, retrospective cohort study on the impact of roflumilast on exacerbations and economic burden among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in the real world

Authors Wan Y, Sun S, Corman S, Huang X, Gao X, Shorr A

Received 31 December 2014

Accepted for publication 10 March 2015

Published 7 October 2015 Volume 2015:10(1) Pages 2127—2136


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Richard Russell

Yin Wan,1 Shawn X Sun,2 Shelby Corman,1 Xingyue Huang,2 Xin Gao,1 Andrew F Shorr3

1Health Economics and Modeling, Outcomes Research, Pharmerit International, Bethesda, MD, USA; 2Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Forest Laboratories, LLC, an affiliate of Actavis, Inc., Jersey City, NJ, USA; 3Pulmonary Critical Care, Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA

Background: Roflumilast is approved in the United States to reduce the risk of COPD exacerbations in patients with severe COPD. Exacerbation rates, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and costs were compared between roflumilast patients and those receiving other COPD maintenance drugs.
Methods: LifeLink™ Health Plan Claims Database was used to identify patients diagnosed with COPD who initiated roflumilast (roflumilast group) or ≥3 other COPD maintenance drugs (non-roflumilast group) from May 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012. Patients must have been enrolled for 12 months before (baseline) and 3 months after (postindex) the initiation date, ≥40 years old, not systemic corticosteroid dependent, and without asthma diagnosis at baseline. Difference-in-difference models compared change from baseline in exacerbations, HCRU (office, emergency visits, and hospitalizations), and total costs between groups, adjusting for baseline differences.
Results: A total of 14,211 patients (roflumilast, n=710; non-roflumilast, n=13,501) were included. During follow-up, the rate of overall exacerbations per patient per month decreased by 11.1% in the roflumilast group and increased by 15.9% in the non-roflumilast group (P<0.001). After controlling for baseline differences, roflumilast-treated patients experienced a greater reduction in exacerbations (0.0160 fewer exacerbations per month, P=0.01), numerically greater reductions in hospital admissions (0.003 fewer per month, P=0.57), office visits (0.46 fewer per month, P=0.26), and total costs from baseline compared with non-roflumilast patients ($116 less per month, P=0.62).
Conclusion: In a real-world setting, patients initiating roflumilast experienced reductions in exacerbations versus patients treated with other COPD medications.

Keywords: PDE-4 inhibitor, COPD, outcomes, health care resource utilization

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]


Readers of this article also read:

The phenotype of concurrent chronic bronchitis and frequent exacerbations in patients with severe COPD attending Swedish secondary care units

Sundh J, Johansson G, Larsson K, Lindén A, Löfdahl CG, Sandström T, Janson C

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2015, 10:2327-2334

Published Date: 28 October 2015

A new approach to assess COPD by identifying lung function break-points

Eriksson G, Jarenbäck L, Peterson S, Ankerst J, Bjermer L, Tufvesson E

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2015, 10:2193-2202

Published Date: 14 October 2015

Effect of tiotropium on lung function decline in early-stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: propensity score-matched analysis of real-world data

Lee HY, Choi SM, Lee J, Park YS, Lee CH, Kim DK, Lee SM, Yoon HI, Yim JJ, Kim YW, Han SK, Yoo CG

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2015, 10:2185-2192

Published Date: 13 October 2015

A randomized multicenter Phase II study of perioperative tiotropium intervention in gastric cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Fushida S, Oyama K, Kaji M, Hirono Y, Kinoshita J, Tsukada T, Nezuka H, Nakano T, Noto M, Nishijima K, Fujimura T, Ohta T

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2015, 10:2177-2183

Published Date: 12 October 2015

Endoscopic bronchial valve treatment: patient selection and special considerations

Eberhardt R, Gompelmann D, Herth FJF, Schuhmann M

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2015, 10:2147-2157

Published Date: 8 October 2015

Wheezing, a significant clinical phenotype of COPD: experience from the Taiwan Obstructive Lung Disease Study

Huang WC, Tsai YH, Wei YF, Kuo PH, Tao CW, Cheng SL, Lee CH, Wu YK, Chen NH, Hsu WH, Hsu JY, Wang CC, Lin MS

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2015, 10:2121-2126

Published Date: 7 October 2015

A real-world evaluation of indacaterol and other bronchodilators in COPD: the INFLOW study

Juvelekian G, El-Sorougi W, Pothirat C, Yunus F, De Guia T, Kuo H, Basu Patnaik S, Pilipovic V

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2015, 10:2109-2120

Published Date: 5 October 2015

Sonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic dysfunction in COPD patients

Scheibe N, Sosnowski N, Pinkhasik A, Vonderbank S, Bastian A

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2015, 10:1925-1930

Published Date: 11 September 2015