Back to Browse Journals » Neurobehavioral HIV Medicine » Volume 3

A comparison of screening batteries in the detection of neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected Spanish speakers

Authors Levine AJ, Palomo M, Hinkin CH, Valdes-Sueiras M, Lopez E, Mathisen G, Donovan S, Singer EJ

Published 26 September 2011 Volume 2011:3 Pages 79—86

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NBHIV.S22553

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2

Andrew J Levine1, Manuel Palomo1, Charles H Hinkin2,3, Miguel Valdes-Sueiras1,5, Enrique Lopez3,4, Glenn Mathisen1,5, Suzanne Donovan1,5, Elyse J Singer1
1National Neurological AIDS Bank, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 3Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 4Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles; 5Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA, USA

Background: A substantial number of Spanish-speaking individuals from Mexico and Central America are now living in the United States. These individuals are at heightened risk for HIV infection and, due to late diagnosis and limited resources, for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Early detection is key, yet adequate methods for detecting HAND in Spanish speakers, especially in resource-poor areas, remains problematic. Therefore, it is necessary to identify accurate yet efficient neurocognitive screening tools that are appropriate for use in resource-limited AIDS clinics serving Spanish-speaking patients.
Methods: Twenty-one Spanish-speaking, HIV-positive adults who migrated from Mexico or Central America underwent neuromedical and neurocognitive evaluation in Spanish. The concordance of three neurocognitive screening measures (the HIV Dementia Scale [HDS], the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE], and the NEUROPSI) with a comprehensive neuropsychological battery was examined. In addition, accuracy in detecting neurocognitive impairment using standard and alternative cutoff scores was examined.
Results: The HDS and the NEUROPSI showed high correlation with the comprehensive neuropsychological battery. The HDS and the NEUROPSI also had the highest sensitivity (67% and 75%, respectively) and specificity (50% and 38%, respectively). Both measures also showed greater sensitivity than the MMSE to very mild forms of HAND.
Conclusion: In this small sample of HIV-positive Spanish speakers from Mexico and Central America living in the United States, the HDS and the NEUROPSI demonstrated reasonable accuracy in detecting neurocognitive impairment, while the MMSE demonstrated very poor accuracy. The HDS and the NEUROPSI were equally sensitive in detecting mild HAND. Continued test development is required to capture this disorder, especially in resource-limited settings.

Keywords: HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders, Spanish speaking, NEUROPSI, HIV Dementia Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF] 

 

Other article by this author:

CCL3 genotype and current depression increase risk of HIV-associated dementia

Andrew J Levine, Elyse J Singer, Janet S Sinsheimer, et al

Neurobehavioral HIV Medicine 2009, 1:1-7

Published Date: 17 November 2009

Readers of this article also read:

The association between the subjective memory complaints scale and depressive state and cognitive impairment: a factor analysis

Tomita T, Yasui-Furukori N, Sugawara N, Takahashi I, Sawada K, Nakamura K

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2015, 11:2935-2941

Published Date: 23 November 2015

Design and activity of a cyclic mini-β-defensin analog: a novel antimicrobial tool

Scudiero O, Nigro E, Cantisani M, Colavita I, Leone M, Mercurio FA, Galdiero M, Pessi A, Daniele A, Salvatore F, Galdiero S

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015, 10:6523-6539

Published Date: 15 October 2015

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a new device for eye drops instillation in patients with glaucoma

Junqueira DM, Lopes FS, Souza FC, Dorairaj S, Prata TS

Clinical Ophthalmology 2015, 9:367-371

Published Date: 23 February 2015

Level of agreement between self-rated and clinician-rated instruments when measuring major depressive disorder in the Thai elderly: a 1-year assessment as part of the THAISAD study

Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Wannarit K, Saisavoey N, Pinyopornpanish M, Lueboonthavatchai P, Apisiridej N, Srichan T, Ruktrakul R, Satthapisit S, Nakawiro D, Hiranyatheb T, Temboonkiat A, Tubtimtong N, Rakkhajeekul S, Wongtanoi B, Tanchakvaranont S, Bookkamana P, Srisutasanavong U, Nivataphand R, Petchsuwan D

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2014, 9:377-382

Published Date: 25 February 2014

Results of a human factors experiment of the usability and patient acceptance of a new autoinjector in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Schwarzenbach F, Dao Trong M, Grange L, Laurent PE, Abry H, Cotten J, Granger C

Patient Preference and Adherence 2014, 8:199-209

Published Date: 11 February 2014

Correlates of current suicide risk among Thai patients with bipolar I disorder: findings from the Thai Bipolar Disorder Registry

Suttajit S, Paholpak S, Choovanicvong S, Kittiwattanagul K, Pratoomsri W, Srisurapanont M

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2013, 9:1751-1757

Published Date: 11 November 2013

Real-world effectiveness of valsartan on hypertension and total cardiovascular risk: review and implications of a translational research program

Abraham I, MacDonald K, Hermans C, Aerts A, Lee C, Brié H, Vancayzeele S

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2011, 7:209-235

Published Date: 31 March 2011