-
International Journal of Wine Research
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Wine rating scales: Assessing their utility for producers, consumers, and oenologic researchers
Original Research
(3858) Views (898) Full article downloads
Authors: Domenic V Cicchetti, Arnold F Cicchetti
Published Date February 2009
Volume 2009:1 Pages 73 - 83
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWR.S4703
Domenic V Cicchetti1, Arnold F Cicchetti2
1Yale Home Office, North Branford, CT, USA; 2Consulting Specialist of Wine, Director of National Accounts, Wine Warehouse, San Anselmo, CA, USA
Abstract: The authors studied seven wine rating scales judged to be useful for the wine producer, consumer, or oenologic researcher: (1) My Wine Rating scale; (2) the Amerine and Roessler (1983) wine rating system; (3) the redwinebuzz.com rating system; (4) Robert Parker’s wine rating scale; (5) the Wine Spectator scale; (6) the Stephen Tanzer scale; and (7) the Chebnikowski Winespider evaluation system. Statistics were applied to answer three hypothetical oenologic questions: (1) Does a particular wine meet criterion for everyday consumption? (2) How well do tasters agree on both the level of wine aroma and bouquet? And (3) How well do tasters agree on the overall quality of a wine, both currently, and after it has been appropriately cellared for 10 years? The implications of this study were discussed in terms of their heuristic value for further oenologic research. One fundamental issue that has received little or no attention in oenologic research is a determination of measurable taster variability that can be expected to occur when the same wine is blind tasted again, either by the same taster or by other tasters blindly evaluating the same wine.
Keywords: wine, rating scales, taster consistency
Readers of this article also read:
A fast and simple method for wild yeast flora detection in winemaking
Wine consumers’ environmental knowledge and attitudes: Influence on willingness to purchase
A brief introduction to multivariate methods in grape and wine analysis
Effect of wood type and thickness on acetification kinetics in traditional vinegar production
Identification of dominant lactic acid bacteria isolated from grape juices. Assessment of its biochemical activities relevant to flavor development in wine
Sustainable viticulture and winery practices in California: What is it, and do customers care?
Wine tourism product clubs as a way to increase wine added value: the case of Spain
Biodiversity of wine grapes: less than we thought
Nonlinear hedonic pricing: a confirmatory study of South African wines
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- Does wine prevent dementia?
- Wine consumers’ environmental knowledge and attitudes: Influence on willingness to purchase
- China’s role in global competition in the wine industry: A new contestant and future trends
- Mycoflora and production of wine from fruits of soursop (Annona Muricata L.)




