-
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Utility of double-contrast multidetector CT scans to assess cartilage thickness after tibial plafond fracture
Methodology
(2311) Views (697) Full article downloads
Authors: Thaddeus P Thomas, Christopher J Van Hofwegen, Donald D Anderson, et al
Published Date November 2009
Volume 2009:1(Default) Pages 23 - 29
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S7387
Thaddeus P Thomas1,2, Christopher J Van Hofwegen1, Donald D Anderson1,2, Thomas D Brown1,2, J Lawrence Marsh1
1Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
Abstract: The pathophysiology of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) after intraarticular fractures is poorly understood. Pursuit of a better understanding of this disease is complicated by inability to accurately monitor its onset, progression and severity. Common radiographic methods used to assess PTOA do not provide sufficient image quality for precise cartilage measurements. Double-contrast multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is an alternative method that may be useful, since it produces high-quality images in normal ankles. The purpose of this study was to assess this technique’s performance in assessing cartilage maintenance in ankles with an intraarticular fracture. Thirty-six tibial plafond fractures were followed over two years, with 31 MDCTs being obtained four months after injury, and 22 MDCTs after two years. Unfortunately, clinical results with this technique were unreliable due to pathology (presumed arthrofibrosis) and technical problems (pooling of contrast). The arthrofibrosis that developed in many patients inhibited proper joint access and contrast infiltration, although high-quality images were obtained in 11 patients. In this patient subset, in which focal regions of cartilage degeneration could be visualized, thickness could be measured with a high degree of fidelity. While thus useful in selected instances, double-contrast MDCT was too unreliable to be recommended to assess these particular types of injuries.
Keywords: posttraumatic osteoarthritis, cartilage, imaging, fracture
Readers of this article also read:
Excessively anterior placement of the fibular interfragmentary screw can result in a malreduced ankle syndesmosis – a technical report
Comparison of avian and nonavian hyaluronic acid in osteoarthritis of the knee
One-stage vs two-stage cartilage repair: a current review
Treatment of osteoarthritis knee pain: update on use of intra-articular hylan G-F 20
Topical diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee
Erratum
Physiotherapy in early phase of low back pain
Clinical update on the use of biomarkers of airway inflammation in the management of asthma
Peroneal island flap for wound coverage in complex injuries of the lower extremity
- Testimonials
"You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Local anesthetic failure associated with inflammation: verification of the acidosis mechanism and the hypothetic participation of inflammatory peroxynitrite
- Inflammatory mediators: Parallels between cancer biology and stem cell therapy
- Inflammatory mechanisms in the lung
- Rotator cuff troublemakers: pitfalls of MRI and ultrasound




