skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Update on rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction

Review

(2656) Views  (2348) Full article downloads

Authors: John Nyland, Emily Brand, Brent Fisher

Published Date September 2010 Volume 2010:1 Pages 151 - 166
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S9327

John Nyland, Emily Brand, Brent Fisher

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA

Abstract: As anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has evolved to less invasive, more anatomical approaches, rehabilitation of the injured athlete has likewise become more progressive and innovative, with a sound understanding of graft and fixation strength and biologic healing-remodeling constraints. This review discusses these innovations including specific considerations before surgery, when planning rehabilitation timetables, and the importance of reestablishing nonimpaired active and passive knee range of motion and biarticular musculotendinous extensibility in positions of function. Concepts of self-efficacy or confidence and reestablishing the “athlete role” are also addressed. Since ACL injury and reinjury are largely related to the influence of structure-form-function on dynamic knee joint stability, the interrelationships between sensorimotor, neuromuscular, and conventional resistance training are also discussed. Although pivot shift “giving way” relates to function loss following ACL injury, anterior translational laxity often does not. Although there is growing evidence that progressive eccentric training may benefit the patient following ACL reconstruction, there is less evidence supporting the use of functional ACL knee braces. Of considerable importance is selecting and achieving a criteria-based progression to sports-specific training, reestablishing osseous homeostasis and improved bone density, blending open and closed kinetic chain exercises at the appropriate time period, and appreciating the influence of the trunk, upper extremities, and sports equipment use on knee loads. We believe that knee dysfunction and functional recovery should be considered from a local, regional, and global perspective. These concepts are consolidated into our approach to prepare patients for return to play including field testing and maintenance training.

Keywords: knee, arthroscopy, neuromuscular reeducation, sport-specific training







Readers of this article also read:

Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Rotator cuff troublemakers: pitfalls of MRI and ultrasound
New options in the management of tendinopathy
Meniscal tears
Cold and compression in the management of musculoskeletal injuries and orthopedic operative procedures: a narrative review
Ankle sprain: pathophysiology, predisposing factors, and management strategies
Exercise for people with hip or knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of land-based and aquatic interventions
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy
A three-dimensional anatomy of the posterolateral compartment of the knee: the use of a new technology in the study of musculoskeletal anatomy