-
Vascular Health and Risk Management
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Triple combination therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide vs dual combination therapy with amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide for stage 2 hypertensive patients
Original Research
(2300) Views (1210) Full article downloads
Authors: Maurizio Destro, Nora Crikelair, Joseph Yen, et al.
Published Date September 2010
Volume 2010:6 Pages 821 - 827
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S11522
Maurizio Destro1, Nora Crikelair2, Joseph Yen2, Robert Glazer1Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Pavia, Stradella (PV), Italy; 2Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA
Objective: This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of triple therapy with amlodipine/valsartan+hydrochlorothiazide (Aml/Val+HCTZ) vs dual therapy with Aml+HCTZ in stage 2 hypertensive patients.
Methods: The analysis included patients from an eight-week, multicenter, double-blind study, randomized to Aml/Val 10/160 mg or Aml 10 mg groups, who received add-on HCTZ 12.5 mg at week 4 if mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) was >130 mmHg.
Results: Of the patients receiving Aml/Val+HCTZ and Aml+HCTZ, 98% (N = 133/136) and 96% (N = 200/208) completed the study, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups (Caucasians, 80.2%; diabetics, 14.8%; age, 58.6 years [28.2% ≥ 65 years]; body mass index, 31 kg/m2; mean sitting blood pressure (msBP), 171.5/95.5 mmHg [18% msSBP ≥ 180 mmHg]). Aml/Val+HCTZ provided significantly greater msBP reductions from baseline to week 8 than Aml+HCTZ (30.5/13.8 vs 24.3/8.3 mmHg, P < 0.0001). The incremental msBP reduction (week 4 to 8) with HCTZ added to Aml/Val was greater than when added to Aml (6.9/3.5 vs 3.1/1.0 mmHg, P < 0.01). Treatments were well tolerated with similar overall incidence of adverse events (Aml/Val+HCTZ: 33.8%, Aml+HCTZ: 33.2%).
Conclusion: Aml/Val+HCTZ provided significantly greater BP reductions than Aml+HCTZ in patients with stage 2 hypertension. Aml/Val+HCTZ triple therapy may be a suitable option for patients requiring more than two agents to reach target BP.
Keywords: amlodipine, valsartan, stage 2 hypertension, HCTZ, triple therapy
Other articles by Dr Maurizio Destro
Role of valsartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide fixed combination in blood pressure control: an update- Join ISVH
Be part of the World's leading experts in vascular health by joining the International Society of Vascular Health (ISVH)
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- The western diet and lifestyle and diseases of civilization
- Stiffness of the large arteries in individuals with and without Down syndrome
- Effects of Azelnidipine plus OlmesaRTAn versus amlodipine plus olmesartan on central blood pressure and left ventricular mass index: the AORTA study
- Vascular effects of rapid-acting insulin analogs in the diabetic patient: a review




