-
Clinical Audit
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
The impact of a governmental policy prohibiting wearing of wristwatches on the measurement of pulse and respiratory rate
Other
(1569) Views (675) Full article downloads
Authors: David Spitzer
Published Date September 2010
Volume 2010:2 Pages 97 - 101
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CA.S10499
David Spitzer
Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
Background: It is recommended that pulse and respiratory rates are measured accurately rather than estimated. The UK’s ‘bare below the elbow’ policy prohibiting hospital doctors from wearing wristwatches conflicts with this guidance.
Objective: To assess (a) whether pulse/respiratory rates are measured accurately or estimated, (b) adherence to the ‘bare below the elbow’ policy with regard to the wearing of wristwatches, and (c) if the policy has affected whether pulse/respiratory rates are measured or estimated.
Method: A questionnaire was distributed to 52 doctors (with a wide range of experience) working in medical and surgical wards, accident and emergency and the intensive care unit at the Homerton University Hospital, London, UK.
Results: Findings indicated that (a) there is wide variation of practice over whether pulse/respiratory rates are measured accurately or estimated, (b) doctors generally adhere to instructions not to wear wristwatches, and (c) a majority of doctors indicate that the ‘bare below the elbow’ policy has affected their behavior with regard to measurement of pulse and respiratory rate.
Conclusions: If the importance of accurate measurement of pulse/respiratory rate is accepted, these findings suggest that doctors be provided with watches which they can attach to other parts of their clothing or neck fobs. Although not ideal, this solution provides a way of resolving the conflict between the ‘bare below the elbow’ policy and accurate measurement of pulse and respiratory rate.
Keywords: pulse, respiratory rate, measurement, governmental policy, bare below the elbow, dress code, wristwatch, clinical audit
Readers of this article also read:
An audit of orthopedic operation notes: what are we missing?
Comparing coding between interventional radiologists and hospital coding departments
Time-consuming eyelashes: an audit of trichiasis management
A snap audit of “did not attend” patients in a gynecologic outpatient clinic
Audit on body mass index in pregnancy
Outpatient hysteroscopy: the Calderdale and Huddersfield experience
Compliance, concordance, and patient-centered care
Sociodemographic differences in diabetic retinopathy screening; using patient-level primary care data for health equity audit
A literature review to explore the link between treatment satisfaction and adherence, compliance, and persistence
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- Health literacy and health seeking behavior among older men in a middle-income nation
- Increasing access to quality health care for the poor: Community perceptions on quality care in Uganda
- Prolonged rupture of membranes in term infants: should all babies be screened?
- Narcissistic rage: The Achilles’ heel of the patient with chronic physical illness




