International Journal of Nanomedicine
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
Support Open Access and Dove Press
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
The comparative immunotoxicity of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and colloidal silica nanoparticles in mice
(3608) Total Article Views
Authors: Lee S, Kim MS, Lee D, Kwon TK, Khang D, Yun HS, Kim SH
Published Date January 2013
Volume 2013:8(1) Pages 147 - 158
|Received:||24 October 2012|
|Accepted:||24 November 2012|
|Published:||07 January 2013|
1CMRI, Laboratory of Immunotoxicology, Department of Pharmacology,School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; 2Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; 3Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; 4School of Nano and Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea; 5Engineering Ceramics Department, Powder and Ceramics Division, Korea Institute of Materials Science, Changwon, Republic of Korea
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Background: Mesoporous silica (MPS) nanoparticles (NPs), which have a unique pore structure and extremely large surface area and pore volume, have received much attention because of their biomedical application potential. Using MPS NPs for biomedical devices requires the verification of their biocompatibility because the surface area of NPs is one of the most important determinants of toxicity, including the cellular uptake and immune response. We have previously reported that the cytotoxicity and inflammation potential of MPS NPs have been shown to be lower than those of general amorphous colloidal silica (Col) NPs in macrophages, but the low cytotoxicity does not guarantee high biocompatibility in vivo. In this study, we compared the in vivo immunotoxicity of MPS and Col NPs in the mouse model to define the effects of pore structural conditions of silica NPs.
Materials and methods: Both MPS and Col NPs (2, 20, and 50 mg/kg/day) were intraperitoneally administered in female BALB/c mice for 4 weeks, and clinical toxicity, lymphocyte population, serum IgG/IgM levels, and histological changes were examined.
Results: There was no overt sign of clinical toxicity in either MPS- or Col-treated mice. However, MPS NPs led to significant increases in liver and spleen weight and splenocyte proliferation. Mice treated with MPS NPs showed altered lymphocyte populations (CD3+, CD45+, CD4+, and CD8+) in the spleen, increased serum IgG and IgM levels, and histological changes. Despite slight changes in lymphocyte populations in the spleen, Col NPs did not alter other immunological factors.
Conclusion: The results indicate that in vivo exposure to MPS NPs caused more damage to systemic immunity than that of Col NPs through the dysregulation of the spleen. The results for in vivo data are inconsistent with those for in vitro data, which show lower cytotoxicity for MPS NPs. These results suggest the importance of verifying biocompatibility both in vitro and in vivo during the design of new nanomaterials.
Keywords: immunotoxicity, mesoporous silica nanoparticle, colloidal silica nanoparticle, spleen
Cannotea Citeulike Del.icio.us Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Readers of this article also read:
- ASNM conference 2014
Join us at the American Society for Nanomedicine Conference in Maryland, March 28th - 30th 2014.
- Impact Factors
- Have an opinion about one of our articles?
We encourage you to write a letter to the editor.
- Interested in being a peer-reviewer?
Click here to register.
- MLA'14 -
May 16–21, 2014
Authors are welcome to send an abstract or draft manuscript to obtain a view from the Editor about the suitability of their paper. Please email here and include which journal you are interested in submitting your manuscript to. Our Editors will do a quick review of your paper and advise if they believe it is appropriate for submission to their journal.
- Formulation and evaluation of drug-loaded targeted magnetic microspheres for cancer therapy
- Intracellular heavy metal nanoparticle storage: progressive accumulation within lymph nodes with transformation from chronic inflammation to malignancy
- Applications of gold nanoparticles in cancer nanotechnology
- Fungus-mediated biological synthesis of gold nanoparticles: potential in detection of liver cancer