-
Vascular Health and Risk Management
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Should we screen for masked hypertension in patient with vascular disease?
Original Research
(1789) Views (520) Full article downloads
Authors: Pascal Delsart, Philippe Marboeuf, Cedric Delhaye, et al
Published Date May 2010
Volume 2010:6 Pages 333 - 338
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S9980
Pascal Delsart1, Philippe Marboeuf1, Cedric Delhaye2, Gilles Lemesle2, Claire Mounier-Vehier1
1Service de Médecine Vasculaire et Hypertension Artérielle, 2Service d’hémodynamique et de Cardiologie B, University Hospital of Lille, France
Background: The influence of hypertension on cardiovascular risk is well known. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) is able to identify patients with masked hypertension (MH) underdetected by clinical BP measurement. The benefit of screening for MH in a highrisk population was investigated.
Aims: To detect MH in a population with no prior history of hypertension and medically treated for peripheral or coronary arterial disease.
Methods: Thirty-eight consecutive patients with peripheral or coronary artery disease documented with arteriography, without a history of hypertension, and with an admission BP < 140/90 mmHg underwent ABPM after discharge. Ambulatory BP ≥ 125/80 mmHg were defined as MH.
Results: MH was found in 11 patients (28.9%). The MH group had a mean systolic and diastolic hospitalization BP significantly higher (127 versus 115 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.002 and 76 versus 66 mmHg, P = 0.01), and tended to have a higher admission systolic BP and pulse pressure (127 versus 121 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.07; and 54 versus 46 mmHg, P = 0.06). The first BP measurement on the 24-hour ABPM was significantly higher in the MH group 140 versus 121 mmHg, P = 0.001, for systolic BP and 84 versus 74 mmHg, P = 0.03, for diastolic BP.
Conclusions: MH was found in patients with documented and medically treated vascular disease. BP in the prehypertensive range is associated with MH. Systematic screening for MH in this high-risk population requires further investigation.
Keywords: blood pressure, monitoring, masked hypertension, vascular disease
Other articles by Dr Pascal Delsart
Readers of this article also read:
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Berberine: metabolic and cardiovascular effects in preclinical and clinical trials
Fenofibric acid: a new fibrate approved for use in combination with statin for the treatment of mixed dyslipidemia
Natriuretic peptides (BNP and NT-proBNP): measurement and relevance in heart failure
Cardiac risk stratification: Role of the coronary calcium score
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy: new avenues for safety
Erratum
New treatment options in the management of hypertension: appraising the potential role of azilsartan medoxomil
Cardiac ryanodine receptor in metabolic syndrome: is JTV519 (K201) future therapy?
- Join ISVH
Be part of the World's leading experts in vascular health by joining the International Society of Vascular Health (ISVH)
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- The western diet and lifestyle and diseases of civilization
- Stiffness of the large arteries in individuals with and without Down syndrome
- Effects of Azelnidipine plus OlmesaRTAn versus amlodipine plus olmesartan on central blood pressure and left ventricular mass index: the AORTA study
- Vascular effects of rapid-acting insulin analogs in the diabetic patient: a review




