Back to Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 7

Should treatment for depression be based more on patient preference?

Authors Winter SE, Barber JP

Received 10 August 2013

Accepted for publication 10 September 2013

Published 9 October 2013 Volume 2013:7 Pages 1047—1057

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S52746

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 4



Sophia E Winter,1 Jacques P Barber2

1Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA; 2The Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY, USA

Abstract: Patient treatment preferences are of growing interest to researchers, clinicians, and patients. In this review, an overview of the most commonly recommended treatments for depression is provided, along with a brief review of the evidence supporting their efficacy. Studies examining the effect of patient treatment preferences on treatment course and outcome are summarized. Existing literature on what treatment options patients tend to prefer and believe to be helpful, and what factors may affect these preferences, is also reviewed. Finally, clinical implications of research findings on patient preferences for depression management are discussed. In summary, although our knowledge of the impact of patient preferences on treatment course and outcome is limited, knowing and considering those preferences may be clinically important and worthy of greater study for evidence-based practice.

Keywords: treatment preferences, depression, antidepressants, psychotherapy

Creative Commons License © 2013 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.