skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Rosuvastatin, inflammation, C-reactive protein, JUPITER, and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease – a perspective

Review

(4705) Views  (1582) Full article downloads

Authors: Richard Kones

Published Date December 2010 Volume 2010:4 Pages 383 - 413
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S10812

Richard Kones
The Cardiometabolic Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA

Abstract: The major public health concern worldwide is coronary heart disease, with dyslipidemia as a major risk factor. Statin drugs are recommended by several guidelines for both primary and secondary prevention. Rosuvastatin has been widely accepted because of its efficacy, potency, and superior safety profile. Inflammation is involved in all phases of atherosclerosis, with the process beginning in early youth and advancing relentlessly for decades throughout life. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-studied, nonspecific marker of inflammation which may reflect general health risk. Considerable evidence suggests CRP is an independent predictor of future cardiovascular events, but direct involvement in atherosclerosis remains controversial. Rosuvastatin is a synthetic, hydrophilic statin with unique stereochemistry. A large proportion of patients achieve evidence-based lipid targets while using the drug, and it slows progression and induces regression of atherosclerotic coronary lesions. Rosuvastatin lowers CRP levels significantly. The Justification for Use of statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial was designed after the observation that when both low density lipoprotein and CRP were reduced, patients fared better than when only LDL was lowered. Advocates and critics alike acknowledge that the benefits of rosuvastatin in JUPITER were real. After a review, the US Food and Drug Administration extended the indications for rosuvastatin to include asymptomatic JUPITER-eligible individuals with one additional risk factor. The American Heart Association and Centers of Disease Control and Prevention had previously recognized the use of CRP in persons with "intermediate risk" as defined by global risk scores. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines went further and recommended use of statins in persons with low LDL and high CRP levels at intermediate risk. The JUPITER study focused attention on ostensibly healthy individuals with "normal" lipid profiles and high CRP values who benefited from statin therapy. The backdrop to JUPITER during this period was an increasing awareness of a rising cardiovascular risk burden and imperfect methods of risk evaluation, so that a significant number of individuals were being denied beneficial therapies. Other concerns have been a high level of residual risk in those who are treated, poor patient adherence, a need to follow guidelines more closely, a dual global epidemic of obesity and diabetes, and a progressively deteriorating level of physical activity in the population. Calls for new and more effective means of reducing risk for coronary heart disease are intensifying. In view of compelling evidence supporting earlier and aggressive therapy in people with high risk burdens, JUPITER simply offers another choice for stratification and earlier risk reduction in primary prevention patients. When indicated, and in individuals unwilling or unable to change their diet and lifestyles sufficiently, the benefits of statins greatly exceed the risks. Two side effects of interest are myotoxicity and an increase in the incidence of diabetes.

Keywords: rosuvastatin, JUPITER study, statin drugs, C-reactive protein, dyslipidemia, cholesterol, primary prevention, cardiovascular risk, coronary heart disease, inflammation, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, Framingham risk score, Reynolds risk score, coronary artery calcification, carotid intima-media thickness, hypertension, obesity, HMG CoA reductase, mevalonate, prenylation, statin myopathy, pleiotropic, dolichol




 

Other articles by Dr Richard Kones



Readers of this article also read:

Molecular markers of susceptibility to ocular toxoplasmosis, host and guest behaving badly
A review and empirical study of the composite scales of the Das–Naglieri cognitive assessment system
Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin in the management of dyslipidemia
Information technology in pharmacovigilance: Benefits, challenges, and future directions from industry perspectives
Recent advances in the management of chronic stable angina I: Approach to the patient, diagnosis, pathophysiology, risk stratification, and gender disparities
Recent advances in the management of chronic stable angina II. Anti-ischemic therapy, options for refractory angina, risk factor reduction, and revascularization
Mitochondrial therapy for Parkinson’s disease: Neuroprotective pharmaconutrition may be disease-modifying
Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: integration of new data, evolving views, revised goals, and role of rosuvastatin in management. A comprehensive survey
Lipid-lowering therapy: who can benefit
  • Testimonials

    "... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University