-
International Journal of Women's Health
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization
Methodology
(1538) Views (408) Full article downloads
Authors: James M Nicholson
Published Date August 2010
Volume 2010:2 Pages 255 - 262
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S9494
James M NicholsonDepartment of Family Practice and Community Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Purpose: Annual US national rates of family physicians providing maternity care are decreasing and rates of cesarean delivery are increasing. Family physicians tend to have lower cesarean delivery rates than obstetrician specialists, but this association is usually explained by an assumed lower pre-delivery risk for cesarean delivery. This study was developed to compare the estimated risk of cesarean delivery in patients of the two specialties.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study within an urban teaching hospital compared 100 family-physician treated subjects to 300 subjects treated by obstetrician-specialists. Risk factors for cesarean delivery were identified, and an indirect standardization procedure was used to compare the pre-38 week of gestation risk of cesarean delivery in the two groups.
Results: The patients treated by family physicians had a projected pre-38 week of gestation risk of cesarean delivery (17.4%) that was similar to the actual rate of cesarean delivery in the obstetrician-specialist group (16.7%). The Standardized Cesarean Delivery Ratio was 1.04.
Conclusion: Lower cesarean delivery rates provided by family physicians may not be simply due to case-mix issues. Additional studies comparing the pre-delivery estimation of cesarean delivery risk would be helpful in measuring the relative levels of obstetric risk of patients treated by different maternity-care provider types.
Keywords: family medicine obstetrics, cesarean delivery
Readers of this article also read:
Treating dyspareunia caused by vaginal atrophy: a review of treatment options using vaginal estrogen therapy
Optimal management of chronic cyclical pelvic pain: an evidence-based and pragmatic approach
Management of dysfunctional uterine bleeding based on endometrial thickness
Socioeconomic associations of improved maternal, neonatal, and perinatal survival in Qatar
Diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia: an update
Soy use and vasomotor symptoms: Soy Estrogen Alternative follow-up study
Usefulness of serum mass spectrometry to identify women diagnosed with higher grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia may differ by race
Comparison of stereotactic core breast biopsy and open surgical biopsy results at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan
Laparoscopic management of a fallopian tubal torsion complicated by a large hydrosalpinx
- Interested in being a peer-reviewer?
Click here to register.
- Testimonials
"You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Contraceptive practices in Nigeria: Literature review and recommendation for future policy decisions
- Tinidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis
- Diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia: an update
- Treating dyspareunia caused by vaginal atrophy: a review of treatment options using vaginal estrogen therapy




