-
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Review of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing®
Review
(2346) Views (565) Full article downloads
Author: Frans JME Roumen
Published Date April 2008
Volume 2008:4(2) Pages 441 - 451
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S1964
Frans JME Roumen
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands
Abstract: The purpose of this review was to test contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, tolerability, and acceptability as found in the non-comparative studies with NuvaRing® by those found in the randomized trials comparing NuvaRing and combined oral contraceptives (COCs). All large non-comparative studies and all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between NuvaRing and a COC up to and including December 2006 were analyzed. Two large multi-center registration studies, 1 large daily clinical practice study, and 6 RCTs comparing NuvaRing and a COC were identified. The findings in the non-comparative studies were confirmed in the RCTs. Contraceptive efficacy was high showing no significant differences in comparison with the COC; cycle control was good and consistently better than that of the COC; compliance was high and comparable with that of the pill; the incidence of adverse events such as breast tenderness, headache, and nausea was low, but not lower than with the COC despite a halving of the systemic exposure to ethinyl estradiol (EE) with NuvaRing compared with a 30-µg EE-containing COC; the incidence of local and ring-related events was low but higher than with the COC, leading to higher discontinuation rates among NuvaRing users; acceptability was high and comparable between both contraceptives, resulting in a global improvement of sexual function with both methods. After study completion, women using NuvaRing were more likely to continue with their method than women using a COC. The good results with respect to contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, tolerability, and acceptability as achieved with NuvaRing in the large non-comparative registration studies were confirmed in the RCTs comparing NuvaRing with different COCs.
Keywords: acceptability, contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, NuvaRing, tolerability, vaginal ring
- Have an opinion about one of our articles?
We encourage you to write a Letter to the Editor
- American Acne and Rosacea Society
The American Acne and Rosacea Society (AARS), is a 501(c)(6) non-profit organization dedicated to elevating the understanding and treatment of acne and rosacea.
- Tenofovir-associated bone density loss
- The benefits and risks of testosterone replacement therapy: a review
- Drug design with Cdc7 kinase: a potential novel cancer therapy target
- Development of mucosal adjuvants for intranasal vaccine for H5N1 influenza viruses




