-
Vascular Health and Risk Management
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Review of nifedipine GITS in the treatment of high risk patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension
Review
(2545) Views (691) Full article downloads
Authors: Amber Lundy, Nahla Lutfi, Cherylyn Beckey
Published Date May 2009
Volume 2009:5 Pages 429 - 440
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S3066
Amber Lundy, Nahla Lutfi, Cherylyn Beckey
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pharmacy Service, West Palm Beach, FL, USA
Abstract: Nifedipine is a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker (CCB) introduced approximately 30 years ago for the prophylaxis of angina symptoms, and then later utilized as an anti-hypertensive agent. In the 1990s, several meta-analyses and a case-control study were published which raised concern regarding increased mortality and increased risk for myocardial infarction with short-acting nifedipine. Further evaluation of these meta-analyses and case control study underscores some important limitations and the need to further elucidate the role of this class of medications in high-risk patients. Until 2000, there was a paucity of data on the long-term effects as well as the long-term outcomes of CCBs in the treatment of stable coronary disease or in patients with manifestations of the disease such as hypertension or angina. While it has been well established that nifedipine and other dihydropyridines lower blood pressure and improve symptoms of angina, several studies were designed to evaluate the effect of dihydropyridines on “hard” outcomes, specifically cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. In this review, we describe the clinical studies evaluating the use of nifedipine when compared to placebo as well as other anti-hypertensive therapies in an attempt to identify the most appropriate place in therapy for this class of medications and to further clarify its utilization in high-risk patients.
Keywords: nifedipine, dihydropyridine, ACTION, calcium-channel blocker, coronary heart disease, hypertension
Readers of this article also read:
Prognostic stratification of acute pulmonary embolism: Focus on clinical aspects, imaging, and biomarkers
Berberine: metabolic and cardiovascular effects in preclinical and clinical trials
Update on the clinical use of the low-molecular-weight heparin, parnaparin
Effect of glitazones on the progression of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes patients
The utility of troponin measurement to detect myocardial infarction: review of the current findings
Recent advances in the management of chronic stable angina II. Anti-ischemic therapy, options for refractory angina, risk factor reduction, and revascularization
Methemoglobinemia due to topical pharyngeal anesthesia during endoscopic procedures
Hepatotoxicity due to tocilizumab and anakinra in rheumatoid arthritis: two case reports
Outcomes of patients treated with the everolimus-eluting stent versus the zotarolimus-eluting stent in a consecutive cohort of patients at a tertiary medical center
- Join ISVH
Be part of the World's leading experts in vascular health by joining the International Society of Vascular Health (ISVH)
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- The western diet and lifestyle and diseases of civilization
- Stiffness of the large arteries in individuals with and without Down syndrome
- Effects of Azelnidipine plus OlmesaRTAn versus amlodipine plus olmesartan on central blood pressure and left ventricular mass index: the AORTA study
- Vascular effects of rapid-acting insulin analogs in the diabetic patient: a review




