Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
Support Open Access and Dove Press
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia
(2907) Total Article Views
Authors: Suttajit S, Srisurapanont M, Pilakanta S, Charnsil C, Suttajit S.
Published Date January 2013
Volume 2013:9 Pages 113 - 118
|Received:||13 November 2012|
|Accepted:||12 December 2012|
|Published:||16 January 2013|
1Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, 2Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) for the evaluation of depression in patients with schizophrenia.
Methods: Sixty patients with schizophrenia according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Fourth Edition; Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria were recruited to the study. The Thai version of the CDSS, the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 17-item version (HDRS-17), and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were administered. A major depressive episode diagnosed by a psychiatrist according to the DSM-IV-TR was used as a gold standard.
Results: The internal consistency of the Thai version of the CDSS was very good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.869). The inter-rater reliability was found to be in substantial agreement with the intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.979. The test-retest reliability over a period of 3 days was high, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.861. The Thai version of the CDSS showed significant correlations with the MADRS (r = 0.887), the HDRS-17 (r = 0.865), and the depression item of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-G6) (r = 0.833). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the CDSS, MADRS, HDRS-17, and PANSS-G6 against the DSM-IV-TR criteria for major depressive episode were 0.993, 0.954, 0.966, and 0.933, respectively. The optimal cut-off score to discriminate between depressed and non-depressed patients was 6/7, with a sensitivity of 92.31% and specificity of 97.87%.
Conclusion: The Thai version of the CDSS is a reliable and valid measure for the evaluation of depression in Thai patients with schizophrenia.
Keywords: CDSS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 17-item version
Cannotea Citeulike Del.icio.us Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Other articles by Dr Sirijit Suttajit
Readers of this article also read:
"I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University.
- ISMPP (US) 2014
10th Annual Meeting of ISMPP
April 7-9, 2014
Hyatt Regency Crystal City, Arlington, VA, USA
- MLA'14 - "Building Our Information Future"
May 16–21, 2014
- Aggressive behavior, cognitive impairment, and depressive symptoms in elderly subjects
- Critical appraisal of the role of davunetide in the treatment of progressive supranuclear palsy
- Long-term treatment of bipolar disorder with a radioelectric asymmetric conveyor
- Role of nucleus accumbens glutamatergic plasticity in drug addiction