Open Access Medical Statistics
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
Support Open Access and Dove Press
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Projection of long-term outcomes using X-rays and pooled cytology in lung cancer screening
(2930) Total Article Views
Authors: Wu D, Erwin D, Kim S
Published Date August 2011
Volume 2011:1 Pages 13 - 19
Dongfeng Wu1, Diane Erwin2, Seongho Kim1
1Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 2Information Management Services, Inc, Rockville, MD, USA
Purpose: To investigate the long-term outcome of using X-ray and the 3-day "pooled" sputum cytology in lung cancer screening using the Mayo Lung Project data.
Methods: In this study, the statistical method developed by the authors using the Mayo Lung Project data was applied. Each participant eventually falls into one of the four categories depending on whether they would be diagnosed with lung cancer and whether symptoms would have appeared before death. The derived probability of each outcome was presented. Bayesian inference was made for the percentages of true-early-detection, no-early-detection, over-diagnosis, and symptom-free-life. The authors present estimates of these proportions for male heavy smokers by using Markov Chain Monte Carlo samples in the simulation. Human lifetime was treated as a random variable.
Results: The probability that a male heavy smoker will live a lung cancer-free life is about 80%; the probability for developing lung cancer for a male heavy smoker is about 20%, much higher than in the general population (6.95%). The probability of over-diagnosis is low, about 6%–9% among the early detected cases. The probability of true-early-detection is greater than 90%. Finally, the probability of no-early-detection increases as the screening interval increases; among the diagnosed cases, it is about 15% if the screens are 6 months apart, and it is close to 50% if the screens are 2 years apart.
Conclusion: This research provides a framework and a systematic approach for policy makers regarding how to evaluate long-term outcomes of chest X-ray and pooled sputum cytology in lung cancer screening.
Keywords: true early detection, no early detection, over diagnosis, symptom-free life, pooled sputum cytology
Cannotea Citeulike Del.icio.us Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Other articles by Dr Dongfeng Wu
Readers of this article also read:
Call For Submissions
Submit Original Research Article, Review, Case Report, or Rapid Communication in Open Access Medical Statistics
- Reliability and validity of the Mywellness Key physical activity monitor
- Evidence-based decision-making within the context of globalization: A “Why–What–How” for leaders and managers of health care organizations
- "Globalized public health.” A transdisciplinary comprehensive framework for analyzing contemporary globalization’s influences on the field of public health
- Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of cancer: a population-based cohort study