skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in the South Indian adult population: The Andhra Pradesh Eye disease study

Original Research

(2983) Views  (835) Full article downloads

Authors: Sannapaneni Krishnaiah, Marmamula Srinivas, Rohit C Khanna, Gullapalli N Rao

Published Date December 2008 Volume 2009:3 Pages 17 - 27
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S4139

Sannapaneni Krishnaiah1,2,3, Marmamula Srinivas1,2,3, Rohit C Khanna1,2, Gullapalli N Rao1,2,3

1L V Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India; 2International Center for Advancement of Rural Eye Care, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India; 3Vision CRC, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Aim: To report the prevalence, risk factors and associated population attributable risk percentage (PAR) for refractive errors in the South Indian adult population.

Methods: A population-based cross-sectional epidemiologic study was conducted in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. A multistage cluster, systematic, stratified random sampling method was used to obtain participants (n = 10293) for this study.

Results: The age-gender-area-adjusted prevalence rates in those ≥40 years of age were determined for myopia (spherical equivalent [SE] < −0.5 D) 34.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.1–36.1), high-myopia (SE < −5.0 D) 4.5% (95% CI: 3.8–5.2), hyperopia (SE > +0.5 D) 18.4% (95% CI: 17.1–19.7), astigmatism (cylinder < −0.5 D) 37.6% (95% CI: 36–39.2), and anisometropia (SE difference between right and left eyes >0.5 D) 13.0% (95% CI: 11.9–14.1). The prevalence of myopia, astigmatism, high-myopia, and anisometropia significantly increased with increasing age (all p < 0.0001). There was no gender difference in prevalence rates in any type of refractive error, though women had a significantly higher rate of hyperopia than men (p < 0.0001). Hyperopia was significantly higher among those with a higher educational level (odds ratio [OR] 2.49; 95% CI: 1.51–3.95) and significantly higher among the hypertensive group (OR 1.24; 95% CI: 1.03–1.49). The severity of lens nuclear opacity was positively associated with myopia and negatively associated with hyperopia.

Conclusions: The prevalence of myopia in this adult Indian population is much higher than in similarly aged white populations. These results confirm the previously reported association between myopia, hyperopia, and nuclear opacity.

Keywords: refractive errors, risk factors, population attributable risk percent, population-based cross-sectional study, southern India








Readers of this article also read:

Acquired color vision and visual field defects in patients with ocular hypertension and early glaucoma
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Phakic anterior chamber intraocular lens (Verisyse™) implantation in children for treatment of severe ansiometropia myopia and amblyopia: Six-month pilot clincial trial and review of literature
Comparative studies of RNFL thickness measured by OCT with global index of visual fields in patients with ocular hypertension and early open angle glaucoma
Etiology, prevalence, and treatment of dry eye disease
A comparison of manifest refractions, cycloplegic refractions and retinoscopy on the RMA-3000 autorefractometer in children aged 3 to 15 years
Predictability and stability of refraction with increasing optical zone diameter in hyperopic LASIK
Prevalence of refractive error among school children in the Cape Coast Municipality, Ghana
Success rates in the correction of astigmatism with toric and spherical soft contact lens fittings
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy