Back to Browse Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 7

Preference for a fixed combination of brinzolamide/timolol versus dorzolamide/ timolol among patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

Authors Sanseau A, Sampaolesi J, Suzuki Jr ER, Lopes JF, Borel H

Published Date February 2013 Volume 2013:7 Pages 357—362

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S38575

Received 27 September 2012, Accepted 6 December 2012, Published 18 February 2013

Ana Sanseau,1 Juan Sampaolesi,2 Emilio Rintaro Suzuki Jr,3 Joao Franca Lopes,4 Hector Borel5

1Instituto de la Visión, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; 2Consultorio Oftalmologico Sampaolesi, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; 3Oftalmoclinica Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil; 4Hospital El Salvador, Providencia, Chile; 5Fundacion Oftalmologica Los Andes, Vitacura Santiago, Chile


Objective: To assess ocular discomfort upon instillation and patient preference for brinzolamide/timolol relative to dorzolamide/timolol, in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, patient-masked, randomized, crossover study. On day 0, patients received one drop of brinzolamide/timolol in one eye and one drop of dorzolamide/timolol in the contralateral eye. On day 1, patients were randomly assigned to receive one drop of either brinzolamide/timolol or dorzolamide/timolol in both eyes; on day 2, patients received one drop of the alternate treatment in both eyes. Measures included a patient preference question on day 2 (primary) and mean ocular discomfort scale scores on days 1 and 2 (secondary). Safety assessments included adverse events, visual acuity, and slit-lamp examinations.
Results: Of 120 patients who enrolled, 115 completed the study. Of these, 112 patients instilled both medications and expressed a study medication preference on day 2. A significantly greater percentage preferred brinzolamide/timolol to dorzolamide/timolol (67.0% versus 30.4%; P < 0.001). The ocular discomfort (expressed as mean [standard deviation]) with brinzolamide/timolol was significantly lower than with dorzolamide/timolol (day 2: 1.9 [2.3] versus 3.7 [2.8], respectively [P = 0.0003]; both days combined: 2.1 [2.5] versus 3.5 [2.9], respectively [P = 0.00014]). On day 1, five patients receiving brinzolamide/timolol reported five nonserious adverse events (AEs): flu (n = 1), bitter taste (n = 2), and headache (n = 2). Four events, bitter taste (two events) and headache (two events), were considered related to brinzolamide/timolol. Events were mild in intensity, except bitter taste of moderate intensity reported by one patient. No AEs were reported at day 2. All AEs resolved without additional treatment. No clinically relevant changes from baseline were observed in best-corrected visual acuity or slit-lamp examinations of ocular signs.
Conclusion: Patients had less discomfort with brinzolamide/timolol than with dorzolamide/timolol, and more expressed a preference for brinzolamide/timolol. Both treatments were generally safe and well tolerated.

Keywords: brinzolamide, dorzolamide, fixed combination, ocular discomfort, patient preference, timolol

Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Readers of this article also read:

Bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% lowered intraocular pressure of normal-tension glaucoma with minimal adverse events. [Corrigendum]

Tsumura T, Yoshikawa K, Suzumura H, Kimura T, Sasaki S, Kimura I, Takeda R

Clinical Ophthalmology 2013, 7:129-130

Published Date: 16 January 2013

Acute bilateral angle closure glaucoma induced by methazolamide

Aref AA, Sayyad FE, Ayres B, Lee RK

Clinical Ophthalmology 2013, 7:279-282

Published Date: 11 February 2013

Secondary pigmentary glaucoma in patients with underlying primary pigment dispersion syndrome

Sivaraman KR, Patel CG, Vajaranant TS, Aref AA

Clinical Ophthalmology 2013, 7:561-566

Published Date: 21 March 2013

Can intramuscular corticosteroid injection cause nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy?

Bakbak B, Ozturk BT, Gedik S, Koktekir BE, Gonul S

Clinical Ophthalmology 2013, 7:633-635

Published Date: 26 March 2013

Optic disc size and progression of visual field damage in patients with normal-tension glaucoma

Hayamizu F, Yamazaki Y, Nakagami T, Mizuki K

Clinical Ophthalmology 2013, 7:807-813

Published Date: 3 May 2013