-
Journal of Pain Research
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Preemptive versus postoperative lumiracoxib for analgesia in ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery
Original Research
(2916) Views (586) Full article downloads
Authors: Joachim Grifka, Rudolf Enz, Joachim Zink, Jean Louis Hugot, Andreas Kreiss, et al
Published Date November 2008
Volume 2008:1 Pages 27 - 34
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S3928
Joachim Grifka1, Rudolf Enz2, Joachim Zink3, Jean Louis Hugot4, Andreas Kreiss5, Udayasankar Arulmani4, Vincent Yu6, Rosemary Rebuli4, Gerhard Krammer4
1Orthopädische Klinik der Univ, Regensburg, Germany; 2DiaMed Centrum, Klinik Neuendettelsau, Neuendettelsau, Germany; 3Orthopädische Fachpraxisgemeinschaft, Jena Zwätzen, Deutschland, Germany; 4Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 5Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany; 6Novartis Pharma AG, East Hanover, NJ, USA
Abstract: We compared the efficacy and safety of preemptive vs postoperative dosing of lumiracoxib 400 mg in patients undergoing minor ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery. Eligible patients were randomized to preemptive lumiracoxib, postoperative lumiracoxib, and placebo. The main efficacy parameter was pain intensity (PI) (0–100 mm visual analog scale) in the target knee upon movement, 2 hours after surgery. Other efficacy variables included PI in the target knee at rest and upon movement at 1, 3, 4, and 24 hours, time to first rescue medication intake. In the lumiracoxib preemptive and postoperative groups, the estimated treatment difference compared to placebo for primary endpoint was –4.0 (95% CI: –9, –1; p = 0.007) and –3.5 (95% CI: –8.5, 0; p = 0.052), respectively. There was no statistical significant difference between two active treatment groups (p = 0.602). Both preemptive and postoperative lumiracoxib resulted in significantly lower PI scores at rest and after movement at all time-points and no statistically significant difference was observed between the active treatments. Time to rescue medication intake was comparable for both active treatments. The proportion of adverse events was similar among all groups. We conclude that the efficacy of lumiracoxib 400 mg is not affected by the timing of administration (preemptive or postoperative).
Keywords: arthroscopy, arthroscopic knee surgery, lumiracoxib, NSAIDs, postoperative pain, preemptive dosing
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- An eight-week yoga intervention is associated with improvements in pain, psychological functioning and mindfulness, and changes in cortisol levels in women with fibromyalgia
- Problems and barriers of pain management in the emergency department: Are we ever going to get better?
- A new transmucosal drug delivery system for patients with breakthrough cancer pain: the fentanyl effervescent buccal tablet
- Anesthesiologists’ perception of patients’ anxiety under regional anesthesia




