Back to Browse Journals » Advances in Medical Education and Practice » Volume 1

PowerPoint or chalk and talk: Perceptions of medical students versus dental students in a medical college in India

Authors Vikas Seth, Prerna Upadhyaya, Mushtaq Ahmad, et al.

Published Date August 2010 Volume 2010:1 Pages 11—16

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S12154

Published 30 August 2010

Vikas Seth, Prerna Upadhyaya, Mushtaq Ahmad, Vijay Moghe

Department of Pharmacology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Purpose: To assess students’ perceptions of the impact of PowerPoint (PPT) presentations in lectures in comparison to the traditional chalk and talk method and lectures using ­transparencies and overhead projector (TOHP). The study analyzes the preferences for teaching aids of medical students versus dental students.

Methods:
Second year medical and dental undergraduates were asked to fill in a nine-item questionnaire about their perceptions of the three lecture delivery methods. Following analysis of the questionnaire the students were interviewed further. The results were analyzed separately for medical and dental students to see if there was any difference in their perceptions.

Results:
The majority of the medical students (65.33%) preferred PPT presentations, while 15.16% of students preferred the lectures using chalkboard, and 19.51% preferred TOHP for teaching (P < 0.001). Of the dental students: 41.84% preferred chalkboard, 31.21% preferred TOHP, and 25.85% students preferred PPT presentations in the lectures (P < 0.05). Some important comments of the students were also recorded on interview which could be valuable for the medical teachers.

Conclusion:
The medical students clearly preferred the use of PPT presentations while the dental students did not. The study does not bring out evidence based superiority of any lecture delivery method. It appears that in the hands of a trained teacher any teaching aid would be appropriate and effective. This highlights the need for formal training in teaching technologies to develop good presentation skills and thus motivate the students.

Keywords: audiovisual aids, medical education, lecture delivery methods, PowerPoint presentations, OHP, chalkboard

Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Other article by this author:

Role of calcium in morphine dependence and naloxone-precipitated withdrawal in mice

Vikas Seth, Prerna Upadhyaya, Vijay Moghe, et al

Journal of Experimental Pharmacology 2011, 3:7-12

Published Date: 20 February 2011

Readers of this article also read:

Prescribing tests must have curriculum support

Lemon TI, Shah RD

Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2013, 4:91-93

Published Date: 7 May 2013

Bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% lowered intraocular pressure of normal-tension glaucoma with minimal adverse events. [Corrigendum]

Tsumura T, Yoshikawa K, Suzumura H, Kimura T, Sasaki S, Kimura I, Takeda R

Clinical Ophthalmology 2013, 7:129-130

Published Date: 16 January 2013

Corrigendum

De Caterina AR, Harper AR, Cuculi F

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2012, 8:443-445

Published Date: 19 July 2012

Erratum

Todd Levine

Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2012, 6:163-164

Published Date: 21 June 2012

Corrigendum

Hong SH, Kim JE, Kim YK, Minai-Tehrani A, Shin JY, Kang B, Kim HJ, Cho CS, Chae C, Jiang HL, Cho MH

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:3069-3070

Published Date: 20 June 2012

Corrigendum: Softec HD hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens: biocompatibility and precision

Espandar L, Sikder S, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:159-160

Published Date: 6 February 2011