-
Patient Related Outcome Measures
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Perspectives on electronic medical records adoption: electronic medical records (EMR) in outcomes research
Review
(2597) Views (1130) Full article downloads
Authors: Dan Belletti, Christopher Zacker, C Daniel Mullins
Published Date April 2010
Volume 2010:1 Pages 29 - 37
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S8896
Dan Belletti1, Christopher Zacker1, C Daniel Mullins2
1Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA; 2University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
Abstract: Health information technology (HIT) is engineered to promote improved quality and efficiency of care, and reduce medical errors. Healthcare organizations have made significant investments in HIT tools and the electronic medical record (EMR) is a major technological advance. The Department of Veterans Affairs was one of the first large healthcare systems to fully implement EMR. The Veterans Health Information System and Technology Architecture (VistA) began by providing an interface to review and update a patient’s medical record with its computerized patient record system. However, since the implementation of the VistA system there has not been an overall substantial adoption of EMR in the ambulatory or inpatient setting. In fact, only 23.9% of physicians were using EMRs in their office-based practices in 2005. A sample from the American Medical Association revealed that EMRs were available in an office setting to 17% of physicians in late 2007 and early 2008. Of these, 17% of physicians with EMR, only 4% were considered to be fully functional EMR systems. With the exception of some large aggregate EMR databases the slow adoption of EMR has limited its use in outcomes research. This paper reviews the literature and presents the current status of and forces influencing the adoption of EMR in the office-based practice, and identifies the benefits, limitations, and overall value of EMR in the conduct of outcomes research in the US.
Keywords: electronic medical records, health information technology, medical errors
Readers of this article also read:
Berberine: metabolic and cardiovascular effects in preclinical and clinical trials
Critical appraisal of the role of glucosamine and chondroitin in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee
Ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients’ preference of treatment modality independent of psychological distress in end-stage renal disease
Can a gentamicin-specific chart reduce neonatal medication errors?
Health literacy and health seeking behavior among older men in a middle-income nation
Nephroprotective action of glycosaminoglycans: why the pharmacological properties of sulodexide might be reconsidered
Dashboards in neonatology
Anesthesiologists’ perception of patients’ anxiety under regional anesthesia
Everolimus-eluting stents: update on current clinical studies
- Testimonials
"You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Health literacy and health seeking behavior among older men in a middle-income nation
- Increasing access to quality health care for the poor: Community perceptions on quality care in Uganda
- Prolonged rupture of membranes in term infants: should all babies be screened?
- Narcissistic rage: The Achilles’ heel of the patient with chronic physical illness




