-
Vascular Health and Risk Management
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Optimizing blood pressure control through the use of fixed combinations
Review
(2331) Views (918) Full article downloads
Authors: Rainer Düsing
Published Date May 2010
Volume 2010:6 Pages 321 - 325
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S9989
Rainer Düsing
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik 1, Bonn, Germany
Abstract: The majority of hypertensive patients need ≥2 antihypertensive agents to reach goal blood pressure. As an estimate, one-third of unselected hypertensive patients may be successfully treated with monotherapy, one-third may require 2 and the remaining one-third of patients will need ≥3 antihypertensive agents for effective blood pressure control. However, doctors are often hesitant to expand therapy in treated patients whose blood pressure is not lowered to goal (therapeutic inertia). Multiple-drug therapy in the majority of hypertensive patients may also represent one of several factors responsible for the low rates of adherence with chronic antihypertensive treatment. As a consequence, both US and European guidelines recommend single pill combinations to lower the number of pills needed in order to increase medication adherence and, possibly, reduce therapeutic inertia. For 2 drug combinations, the recently revised European (ESC/ESH) guidelines recommend the following options: diuretic plus either calcium channel blocker (CCB) or renin–angiotensin system (RAS) blocker (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker) or CCB plus RAS-blocker. In the absence of substantial evidence, neither JNC-7 (from 2003) nor the European guidelines from 2007 give any meaningful advice on triple combination treatment. It is therefore of interest that the 2009 reappraisal of the European guidelines gives preference to the combination of a RAS blocker and a CCB plus a diuretic. On the background of the substantial number of patients requiring ≥3 drugs for blood pressure control, the recent approval of a single-pill 3-drug combination composed in accordance with the above mentioned ESC/ESH recommendations should be appreciated.
Keywords: blood pressure, fixed-dose combinations, hypertension
Readers of this article also read:
Can nocturnal hypertension predict cardiovascular risk?
Berberine: metabolic and cardiovascular effects in preclinical and clinical trials
Aspirin and clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness and nonresponsiveness in patients with coronary artery stenting
Role of valsartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide fixed combination in blood pressure control: an update
Hepatotoxicity due to tocilizumab and anakinra in rheumatoid arthritis: two case reports
Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer
Integrated control of hypertension by olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide and rationale for combination
Effect of vascular burden as measured by vascular indexes upon vascular dementia: a matched case-control study
Cardiac ryanodine receptor in metabolic syndrome: is JTV519 (K201) future therapy?
- Join ISVH
Be part of the World's leading experts in vascular health by joining the International Society of Vascular Health (ISVH)
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- The western diet and lifestyle and diseases of civilization
- Stiffness of the large arteries in individuals with and without Down syndrome
- Effects of Azelnidipine plus OlmesaRTAn versus amlodipine plus olmesartan on central blood pressure and left ventricular mass index: the AORTA study
- Vascular effects of rapid-acting insulin analogs in the diabetic patient: a review




