skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Necessary alternatives: patients’ views of asthma treatment

Case report

(1663) Views  (640) Full article downloads

Authors: Helen Kopnina, Joke Haafkens

Published Date June 2010 Volume 2010:4 Pages 207 - 217
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S10870

Helen Kopnina1, Joke Haafkens2

1Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labor Studies, University of Amsterdam; 2Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Centre of the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract: This article is based on semistructured interviews and focus groups conducted with 27 asthma patients in The Netherlands who chose complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for treatment of their condition. All subjects were contacted through an online forum for asthma patients hosted by the Dutch Asthma Foundation. Nineteen subjects (12 women and seven men) between the ages of 29 and 65 years participated in the interviews, held between June 2009 and January 2010. All of the participating subjects had experience with conventional medications, including anti-inflammatory corticosteroids and bronchodilators. For the focus group meeting, held in February 2010, the sample included seven subjects (four women and three men) between the ages of 31 and 46 years, none of whom had ever used conventional medication and all of whom were using CAM. All subjects in the sample had been diagnosed with asthma by their physician or lung specialist. The study examined the causes of patient noncompliance with the prescribed medical regime. It is argued that evidence-based rationality on the part of subjects is an overlooked dimension of their experience of asthma. This study demonstrates the role that the patients’ social network, including medical practitioners, friends, and family, and other asthmatics, plays in the process of decision-making and choices about treating asthma. It also demonstrates the role of patients’ information-searching strategies. The author concludes that patient noncompliance with commonly prescribed medication and selection of alternative medical treatment is less a matter of denial of their diagnosis or the severity of their illness, but more a matter of choice informed by evidence-based rationality.

Keywords: asthma, complementary alternative and medicine (CAM), evidence-based medicine (EBM), patient non-compliance, decision-making, indentity








Readers of this article also read:

Gamma knife radiosurgery for uveal melanoma ineligible for brachytherapy by the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study criteria
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
"If we only got a chance.” Barriers to and possibilities for a more health-promoting health service
Patient perspectives in the management of asthma: improving patient outcomes through critical selection of treatment options
Enucleation following treatment with intravenous pentamidine for Acanthamoeba sclerokeratitis
Perception of risk and benefit in patient-centered communication and care
The relationship between deliberate self-harm behavior, body dissatisfaction, and suicide in adolescents: current concepts
Zinc oxide nanoparticles as selective killers of proliferating cells
Hepatotoxicity due to tocilizumab and anakinra in rheumatoid arthritis: two case reports
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy