skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

National Stroke Audit: The Australian experience

Methodology

(2286) Views  (641) Full article downloads

Authors: Dawn Harris, Dominique A Cadilhac, Graeme J Hankey, et al

Published Date April 2010 Volume 2010:2 Pages 25 - 31
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CA.S9435

Dawn Harris1, Dominique A Cadilhac2,3, Graeme J Hankey4,5, Susan Hillier6, Monique Kilkenny2,3, Erin Lalor1 On behalf of the National Stroke Foundation and the National Stroke Audit Collaborative

1National Stroke Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 2National Stroke Research Institute, Heidelberg Heights, VIC, Australia; 3Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 4Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; 5The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia; 6The University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Background: National data measuring compliance with stroke clinical guidelines were unavailable in Australia until 2007. The inaugural National Stroke Audit was established to monitor the quality of clinical practices in acute stroke management.

Aim: To assess adherence to recommended care known to optimize health outcomes for people after experiencing acute stroke.

Methods: Public hospitals managing people with acute stroke conducted a retrospective clinical audit of up to 40 cases admitted between October 1, 2006 and March 31, 2007.

Results: Eighty-nine hospitals contributed clinical audit data on 2,724 people with acute stroke. Discrepancies between recommendations and clinical practice were evident. Half the patients audited were treated in a stroke unit. Often multidisciplinary interventions did not occur within two days, as recommended (46%–75%). Few (3%) patients with ischemic stroke received thrombolysis. Secondary prevention on discharge was inadequate: a quarter did not receive antihypertensives, a third did not receive lipid-lowering medication, and two-thirds did not receive lifestyle advice. Adherence to discharge planning processes was poor (11%–53%).

Conclusions: The audit has provided insights into the performance of the Australian health system on providing acute stroke care. These findings provide an opportunity to develop action plans for improving clinical practice and to monitor temporal progress.

Keywords: stroke, stroke unit, adherence, clinical audit






 

Other articles by Dr Dominique Cadilhac



Readers of this article also read:

30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A national audit
Improving surveillance system and surgical site infection rates through a network: A pilot study from Thailand
Patient-derived acute myeloid leukemia (AML) bone marrow cells display distinct intracellular kinase phosphorylation patterns
Clinical audit to improve obstetric practice: What is the evidence?
Medical complications in patients with stroke: data validity in a stroke registry and a hospital discharge registry
Audit of ultrasound measurement of invasive breast cancers compared with histological size
Identification of a reliable subset of process indicators for clinical audit in stroke care: an example from Australia
Recycling the surgical audit
Cell surface area regulation in neurons in hippocampal slice cultures is resistant to oxygen-glucose deprivation
Stability of additive treatment effects in multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis: a simulation study
  • Testimonials

    "... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University