-
Clinical Ophthalmology
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice
Review
(2560) Views (643) Full article downloads
Authors: LF Porter, RU Khan2, A Hannan, et al
Published Date October 2010
Volume 2010:4 Pages 1223 - 1227
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S12027
LF Porter1, RU Khan2, A Hannan3, SP Kelly11Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bolton, UK; 2Departments of Microbiology, Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bolton, UK; 3Haughton Thornley Medical Centers, NHS Tameside and Glossop, UK
Introduction: Postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis is a devastating complication of cataract surgery. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endophthalmitis is rare. Recent debate over MRSA screening in United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) hospital services has implications for cataract patients and ophthalmology services.
Aims: To discuss issues for clinical practice as based on reflective experience at a UK district general NHS hospital in relation to care of MRSA-positive cataract patients.
Methods: Retrospective case series and reflective practice.
Results: Three cases presented highlight practice points around cataract patients colonized with MRSA. Known or determined MRSA-colonized patients should be treated with anti-microbial agents at time of cataract surgery known to be active against MRSA. Preventative treatment with intracameral vancomycin or intravenous teicoplanin alongside appropriate topical treatments may be of merit. Importantly fluoroquinolones, often prescribed by cataract surgeons, may have a selective effect favoring the proliferation of MRSA.
Conclusion: MRSA screening may cause unnecessary delays in cataract care and may represent a patient safety concern in its own right. Patients colonized with MRSA may safely undergo cataract surgery provided there is no evidence of periorbital infection and provided appropriate infection control and antibiotic prophylaxis measures are used. The well-prepared cataract surgeon needs to be aware of developments in infection control and should liaise with local clinical microbiology colleagues in relation to bacterial resistance to antibiotics.
Keywords: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), endophthalmitis, screening
Readers of this article also read:
Spectral domain optical coherence tomography as an effective screening test for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy (the “flying saucer” sign)
Optic nerve head analysis of superior segmental optic hypoplasia using Heidelberg retina tomography
Hypoperfusive and hypertensive ocular manifestations in Takayasu arteritis
Toxicity of antiglaucoma drugs with and without benzalkonium chloride to cultured human corneal endothelial cells
Combined photodynamic therapy and intravitreal bevacizumab for idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: one-year follow-up
Acanthamoeba and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia keratitis with fungal keratitis in the contralateral eye
Improvement of adenoviral vector-mediated gene transfer to airway epithelia by folate-modified anionic liposomes
Erratum
Erratum
- Journal Indexing
See where all the Dove Press journals are indexed
- Interested in being a peer-reviewer?
Click here to register.
- Insight into 144 patients with ocular vascular events during VEGF antagonist injections
- Endophthalmitis: Pathogenesis, clinical presentation, management, and perspectives
- Protection of neurons in the retinal ganglion cell layer against excitotoxicity by the N-acylethanolamine, N-linoleoylethanolamine
- A computer-based anaglyphic system for the treatment of amblyopia




