-
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Misdiagnosis of patients receiving inhaled therapies in primary care
Original Research
(1763) Views (593) Full article downloads
Authors: José Luis Izquierdo, Antonio Martín, Pilar de Lucas, et al
Published Date July 2010
Volume 2010:5 Pages 241 - 249
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S11123
José Luis Izquierdo1, Antonio Martín2, Pilar de Lucas3, José Miguel Rodríguez-González-Moro3, Carlos Almonacid1, Alexandra Paravisini21Pneumology Department, University Hospital of Guadalajara, 2Pfizer Medical Department, 3Pneumology Department, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
Aim: To analyze the accuracy of diagnosis in a population receiving inhaled therapies due to respiratory diseases in a primary care setting.
Method: Noninterventional, multicenter, cross-sectional, observational epidemiologic study methodology.
Results: A total of 9752 subjects were evaluated. Of these, 4188 (42.9%) patients were ¬diagnosed with asthma, 4175 (42.8%) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and 1389 had a diagnosis of disease of unknown origin. Of those over the age of 40 years, 4079 (50.9%) had COPD and 2877 (35.9%) had asthma. Sixty percent of the subjects were men, and the proportion of men was higher in patients with COPD (83.2%) than in the group with asthma (39.8%, P < 0.0001). Of subjects with COPD, 17.3% had mild, 55.3% had moderate, 24.1% had severe, and 3.2% had very severe disease. With regard to the level of severity of asthma, 34.9% of subjects had intermittent, 34.6% had mild persistent, 27.1% had moderate persistent, and 3.5% had severe persistent disease. Only 13.9% of patients in the COPD group had all the characteristics of COPD based on the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria and an absence of the characteristics of asthma.
Conclusions: The majority of patients receiving inhaled therapy in primary care did not have an accurate diagnosis according to current international guidelines for COPD and asthma. More initiatives for improving diagnostic accuracy in respiratory diseases must be implemented in primary care.
Keywords: respiratory disease, COPD, primary care, asthma, diagnosis
- Journal Indexing
See where all the Dove Press journals are indexed
- Testimonials
"You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Clinical effectiveness of the Respimat® inhaler device in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evidence when compared with other handheld inhaler devices
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity
- The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis
- Exacerbation rate, health status and mortality in COPD – a review of potential interventions




