skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Milnacipran and venlafaxine at flexible doses (up to 200 mg/day) in the outpatient treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder: a 24-week randomized, double-blind exploratory study

Review

(2621) Views  (715) Full article downloads

Authors: Jean-Pierre Olié, David Gourion, Agnès Montagne, et al

Published Date March 2010 Volume 2010:6(1) Pages 71 - 79
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S10184

Jean-Pierre Olié1, David Gourion2, Agnès Montagne3, Michel Rostin4, Marie-France Poirier1

1Service de Santé Mentale et Thérapeutique, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris, France; 217 rue des Marronniers, 75016 Paris, France; 3Pierre Fabre Médicament, Labège, France; 4Pierre Fabre Médicament, Castres, France

Abstract: The objective of this exploratory, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, was to evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of milnacipran and venlafaxine administered at flexible doses (100, 150 or 200 mg/day, bid administration) for 24 weeks (including 4 weeks up titration period) in the outpatient treatment of adults presenting with a moderate or severe episode of major depressive disorder (MDD) without high suicidal risk (MINI-DSM IV-TR). Of the 195 patients included, 134 (68.7%) completed the study. At baseline the two groups were similar, except there was a higher proportion of patients whose episode was severe-DSM IV in the milnacipran group (63.3% versus 54.0% in the venlafaxine group). The initial MADRS score (mean 31.0) decreased progressively during the study, and this decrease was in the two treatment groups (n = 177: 90 milnacipran; 87 venlafaxine) at week 24 (observed case/OC, mean change –23.1 milnacipran; –22.4 venlafaxine). The rate of MADRS response (reduction ≥ 50%) at week 8 and week 24-last observation carried forward/LOCF was similar in the two groups (week 8: 64.4% milnacipran; 65.5% venlafaxine; week 24: 70% milnacipran; 77% venlafaxine), as was the rate of MADRS remission (score ≤ 10) (week 8: 42.2% milnacipran; 42.5% venlafaxine; week 24: 52.2% milnacipran; 62.1% venlafaxine). In both groups, the most common adverse events were: nausea, dizziness, headache, hyperhidrosis and, in males, genito-urinary problems. The overall safety/tolerability and efficacy profiles of milnacipran and venlafaxine administered at flexible dosages (up to 200 mg/day) were similar in the long term treatment of adults during episodes of MDD in an outpatient setting.

Keywords: major depressive episode, adult, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, milnacipran, venlafaxine






 

Other articles by Dr Mike Briley

Abnormal laboratory values during the acute and recovery phases in schizophrenic patients: a retrospective study
Antidepressant therapy with milnacipran and venlafaxine
Choking risk among psychiatric inpatients
Editorial Foreword - Milnacipran: recent findings in depression
Improvement of social adaptation in depression with serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors
Improvement of the noradrenergic symptom cluster following treatment with milnacipran
Milnacipran: a unique antidepressant?
Milnacipran: recent findings in depression
Noradrenergic symptom cluster in depression
Psychiatric diagnoses in patients with burning mouth syndrome and atypical odontalgia referred from psychiatric to dental facilities
Rapid improvement of depressive symptoms in suicide attempters following treatment with milnacipran and tricyclic antidepressants – a case series
Suicidality: risk factors and the effects of antidepressants. The example of parallel reduction of suicidality and other depressive symptoms during treatment with the SNRI, milnacipran
The importance of norepinephrine in depression
The increasing burden of depression
The noradrenergic symptom cluster: clinical expression and neuropharmacology
Treatment of patients with comorbid depression and diabetes with metformin and milnacipran


Readers of this article also read: