skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Management of benign prostatic hyperplasia with silodosin

Review

(3278) Views  (1677) Full article downloads

Authors: Tomonori Yamanishi, Tomoya Mizuno Takao Kamai, et al

Published Date August 2009 Volume 2009:1 Pages 1 - 7
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S5004

Tomonori Yamanishi1, Tomoya Mizuno1, Takao Kamai1, Ken-ichiro Yoshida1, Ryuji Sakakibara2, Tomoyuki Uchiyama3

1Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; 2Department of Neurology, Sakura Hospital, Toho University, Toho, Japan; 3Department of Neurology, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

Abstract: It has been reported that blockade of α1A-adrenoceptor (AR) relieves bladder outlet obstruction, while blockade of α1D-AR is believed to alleviate storage symptoms due to detrusor overactivity. Silodosin, (-)-1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-5-[(2R)-2-({2-[2-(2,2,2trifluoroethoxy) phenoxy]ethyl}amino)propyl]-2,3-dihydro-1H-indole-7- carboxamide, is a new α1A-AR selective antagonist. Silodosin is highly selective for the α1A-AR subtype, showing an affinity for the α1A-AR that is 583- and 55.5-fold higher than its affinity for the α1B- and α1D-ARs, respectively. In randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III studies performed in Japan and the United States, silodosin has been shown to be effective for both storage and voiding symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Early effects of silodosin (after 2–6 hours or day 1) on lower urinary tract symptoms have also been reported. In urodynamic studies, detrusor overactivity disappeared in 40% and improved in 35% of patients after administration. In pressure flow studies, the grade of obstruction on the International Continence Society nomogram showed improvement in 56% of patients. The rate of adverse events in the silodosin, tamsulosin and placebo groups was 88.6%, 82.3%, and 71.6%, respectively. The most common adverse event was (mostly mild) abnormal ejaculation (28.1%). However, few patients (2.8%) discontinued silodosin because of abnormal ejaculation. Orthostatic hypotension showed a similar incidence in the silodosin (2.6%) and placebo (1.5%) groups. In conclusion, silodosin improves detrusor overactivity and obstruction and thus may be effective for both storage and voiding symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Keywords: alpha-blocker, silodosin, benign prostatic hyperplasia, lower urinary tract symptoms








Readers of this article also read:

Periosteoplasty for covering gingival recessions: Clinical results
Differences in quantitative urine composition in stone-forming versus unaffected mate kidneys
Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in recovered and persistent amblyopia
Silodosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Detection of retinal changes in Parkinson's disease with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
Effect of silodosin on specific urinary symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: analysis of international prostate symptom scores in 2 phase III clinical studies
Editorial
Effect of estimated prostate volume on silodosin-mediated improvements in the signs and symptoms of BPH: does prostate size matter?
Safety and efficacy of silodosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Helicobacter pylori infection and primary open-angle glaucoma: is there a connection?