skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Ligand competition assays indicate allosterism and insufficiency of the ternary complex model

Original Research

(1613) Views  (572) Full article downloads

Authors: Eyad Qunaibi, Roger Barber

Published Date July 2010 Volume 2010:3 Pages 73 - 86
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JRLCR.S10902

Eyad Qunaibi1, Roger Barber2

1Formerly (during the time of the study): School of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX. At present: School of Pharmacy, Applied Sciences University, Amman, Jordan; 2Formerly (during the time of the study): Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, University of Texas/Houston, Houston, TX, USA

Background: Many researchers have tried to correlate characteristics of ligand binding at G-protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) with ligand efficacy. The ternary complex model (TCM) is the traditional model for explaining the equilibrium of agonist-GPCR-G-protein interaction, and the effect of this interaction on agonist efficacy. However, no consistent correlation has been proven for various binding-efficacy data, so several extensions of the model have been proposed. These extensions are of descriptive value but their validity cannot be verified by binding-efficacy correlations. Therefore, we developed a novel approach to validate the TCM and its extensions.

Methods: We simulated the predictions of the TCM for relationships within binding parameters. According to the TCM, an increase in the difference between high and low agonist affinities for a receptor (ie, greater KL/KH) should be accompanied by stability or an increase in the fraction of receptors bound to the agonist with high affinity (RH). To validate these predictions we performed ligand competition experiments for a set of ß2-adrenergic receptor (AR) agonists and analyzed the resulting binding data as well as data taken from relevant literature.

Results: No smooth relationship exists between RH and KL/KH in our or others’ data, indicating the insufficiency of the TCM and its extensions. We introduce the allosteric modulators model as an alternative.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first paper in which insufficiency of the TCM and its extensions based on binding data are shown, and the first in which the presence of allosteric modulators of ligand affinity is proven to be a necessity for explaining binding data at GPCRs.

Keywords: G-protein-coupled receptor, ternary complex model, allosteric modulators model, fraction of high affinity receptors, ratio of high and low receptor affinities for agonist, binding-functional correlations







Readers of this article also read:

Periosteoplasty for covering gingival recessions: Clinical results
Radiolucency below the crown of mandibular horizontal incompletely impacted third molars and acute inflammation in men with diabetes
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Modeling short-term antidepressant responsiveness with artificial neural networks
Wearing facemasks when performing lumbar punctures: a snapshot of current practice amongst trainee doctors
Detection of retinal changes in Parkinson's disease with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
Improvement of adenoviral vector-mediated gene transfer to airway epithelia by folate-modified anionic liposomes
Specific mechanism of action of amisulpride in the treatment of schizophrenia and correlation with clinical response and tolerability
Hepatotoxicity due to tocilizumab and anakinra in rheumatoid arthritis: two case reports
Erratum