Leiter-R versus developmental quotient for estimating cognitive function in preschoolers with pervasive developmental disorders

Original Research

(1881) Views  (695) Full article downloads

Authors: Claudia Portoghese, Maura Buttiglione, Andrea De Giacomo, et al

Published Date June 2010 Volume 2010:6(1) Pages 337 - 342

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S10657

Claudia Portoghese¹, Maura Buttiglione¹, Andrea De Giacomo¹, Mariaelena Lafortezza¹, Paola A Lecce¹, Domenico Martinelli², Vito Lozito¹, Lucia Margari¹

¹Child Neurological and Psychiatric Unit, Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, ²Department of Biomedical Science and Oncology, University of Bari, Italy

Abstract: The utility of the developmental quotient (DQ) obtained with the Psychoeducational Profile Revised (PEP-R) was assessed as a means of estimating cognitive ability in young children with pervasive developmental disorders. Data from the PEP-R were analysed in a sample of 44 children aged from 2.0 to 5.9 years (mean 3.46 ± 1), 13 with an autistic disorder and 31 with a pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified. DQ scores were compared with scores from the Leiter International Performance Scale Revised-Visualization and Reasoning Battery (Leiter-R) in the same 44 children. Overall and domain DQs on the PEP-R were significantly correlated with Leiter-R scores. This study suggests that DQ scores obtained from the PEP-R in preschool children with pervasive developmental disorders may be a viable alternative to the Leiter-R as an assessment tool.

Keywords: autism, pervasive development disorder, PEP-R, assessment, cognitive function

Other articles by Dr Lucia Margari