Back to Browse Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 6

It is not always about gains: utilities and disutilities associated with treatment features in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis

Authors Umar N, Schöllgen I, Terris DD

Published Date March 2012 Volume 2012:6 Pages 187—194

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S29285

Received 17 December 2011, Accepted 4 January 2012, Published 15 March 2012

Nasir Umar1, Ina Schöllgen1, Darcey D Terris1,2

1Mannheim Institute of Public Health, Social and Preventive Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; 2Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

Background: Patient-centered care has been proposed as a strategy for improving treatment outcomes in the management of psoriasis and other chronic diseases. A more detailed understanding of patients’ utilities and disutilities associated with treatment features may facilitate shared decision-making in the clinical encounter. The purpose of this study was to examine the features of psoriasis treatment that are most and least preferred by patients and to identify correlates of these preferences.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 163 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis was conducted in a German academic medical center. We assessed patients’ characteristics, elicited their preferences for a range of potential treatment features, and quantified preference scores (utilities) associated with each treatment feature using hierarchical Bayes estimation. After identifying the most and least preferred treatment features, we explored correlates of these preferences using multivariate regression models.
Results: Mean preference scores (MPS) for the least preferred treatment features were consistently greater than those for the most preferred treatment features. Patients generally expressed strong preferences against prolonged treatments in the inpatient setting (MPS = –13.48) and those with a lower probability of benefit (MPS = –12.28), while treatments with a high probability of benefit (MPS = 10.51) were generally preferred. Younger patients and women were more concerned with treatment benefit as compared with older patients and men.
Conclusion: Both negative and positive preferences appear important for shared decision-making. Recognition of characteristics associated with strong negative preferences may be particularly useful in promoting patient-centered environments.

Keywords: conjoint analysis, patient preferences, treatment preferences, psoriasis

Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Readers of this article also read:

Diagnosis of airway obstruction in the elderly: contribution of the SARA study

Sorino C, Battaglia S, Scichilone N, Pedone C, Antonelli-Incalzi R, Sherrill D, Bellia V

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2012, 7:389-395

Published Date: 27 June 2012

Assessment of the impact of adherence and other predictors during HAART on various CD4 cell responses in resource-limited settings

Abrogoua DP, Kablan BJ, Kamenan BAT, Aulagner G, N'Guessan K, Zohoré C

Patient Preference and Adherence 2012, 6:227-237

Published Date: 23 March 2012

A more rapid approach to systematically assessing published associations of genetic polymorphisms and disease risk: type 2 diabetes as a test case

Cho AH, Jiang X, Mann DM, Kawamoto K, Robinson TJ, Wang N, McCarthy JJ, Woodward M, Ginsburg GS

Comparative Effectiveness Research 2012, 2:1-20

Published Date: 26 January 2012

Management of COPD in general practice in Denmark – participating in an educational program substantially improves adherence to guidelines

Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Ejvind Frausing Hansen, Michael Skov Jensen, et al

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2010, 5:73-79

Published Date: 11 March 2010

Functional role of the nicotinic arm of the acetylcholine regulatory axis in human B-cell lines

Juan Arredondo, Denys Omelchenko, Alexander I Chernyavsky, et al

Journal of Experimental Pharmacology 2009, 1:1-7

Published Date: 4 November 2009

Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors

Eduardo Pimenta, Suzanne Oparil

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2009, 5:453-463

Published Date: 19 May 2009