skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Is radical prostatectomy the best option for localized prostate cancer? Current opinion and research

Review

(2027) Views  (576) Full article downloads

Authors: Mike D Shelley, Malcolm D Mason

Published Date July 2010 Volume 2010:3 Pages 47 - 58
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAS.S11122

Mike D Shelley1, Malcolm D Mason2

1Head of Cochrane Urological Cancers Unit, Research Department, Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK; 2Cancer Research Wales Professor of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK

Abstract: Open radical prostatectomy is an effective treatment for prostate cancer with a 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate of about 90% for localized disease. For men with organ confined disease, the 10 year disease-specific survival rate approximates 95% following retropubic prostatectomy. Attempts to improve survival rates by combining androgen deprivation therapy with radical prostatectomy have been unsuccessful. Erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence are common complications following open radical prostatectomy. In an attempt to reduce morbidity, laparoscopic approaches have been developed with reported 8-year cancer control rates of about 70%. Robotic laparoscopic approaches yield a trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and being prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free at 2 years of 74%. Comparative studies do not provide evidence that one surgical approach is superior. Few randomized trials have compared surgery with the other primary therapies for prostate cancer. A Scandinavian randomized study has reported that the metastatic rate and overall mortality are significantly better with surgery compared to watchful waiting. However, there are no published data from randomized trials comparing surgery with radiotherapy (external beam or brachytherapy), active surveillance or minimally invasive procedures. There are ongoing randomized trials comparing surgery with radiotherapy, brachytherapy, and active surveillance, but until these are published, there is no conclusive evidence that surgery is the best primary option for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer.

Keywords: prostatectomy, laparoscopic prostatectomy, radiotherapy, watchful waiting, active surveillance








Readers of this article also read:

Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis
Health literacy and health seeking behavior among older men in a middle-income nation
Functional mobility and balance in community-dwelling elderly submitted to multisensory versus strength exercises
A review on the status of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) cholecystectomy: techniques and challenges
Retinal nerve fiber layer evaluation in multiple sclerosis with spectral domain optical coherence tomography
Perception of risk and benefit in patient-centered communication and care
The relationship between deliberate self-harm behavior, body dissatisfaction, and suicide in adolescents: current concepts
Zinc oxide nanoparticles as selective killers of proliferating cells
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy