Back to Journals » International Journal of Women's Health » Volume 5

Is a bowel resection necessary for deep endometriosis with rectovaginal or colorectal involvement?

Authors Acién P , Núñez C, Quereda F, Velasco I, Valiente M, Vidal V

Received 10 April 2013

Accepted for publication 24 May 2013

Published 29 July 2013 Volume 2013:5 Pages 449—455

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S46519

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 5



Pedro Acién,1–3 Clara Núñez,1 Francisco Quereda,1–3 Irene Velasco,1 Marta Valiente,1 Virginia Vidal1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Juan University Hospital, 2Department/Division of Gynecology, School of Medicine, Miguel Hernandez University, Campus of San Juan, 3Institute of Gynecology PAA, Alicante, Spain

Background: The purpose of this paper is to report the long-term results of surgery without bowel resection in patients suffering from deep infiltrating endometriosis with rectovaginal or colorectal involvement.
Methods: This retrospective observational study identified 42 patients suffering with deep infiltrating endometriosis who underwent surgery. Conservative surgery was performed in 23 women (only one of them with bowel resection), and 19 women underwent a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (HBSO). In the conservative surgery group, a later HBSO was performed in eight patients as a second operation. Pregnancies, recurrences, reoperations, use of hormone replacement therapy, and outcomes during long-term follow-up were analyzed.
Results: The average follow-up duration was 7 ± 5.7 years in conservative surgery cases. Only one patient was treated with sigmoid bowel resection in 1997 and had complications. In this conservative surgery group, 13 patients (56%) received medical treatment after surgery, 10 patients wanted to get pregnant (of whom seven [70%] were successful), and eight patients underwent a subsequent HBSO because of recurrent symptoms and/or endometrioma. Therefore, HBSO was performed in 27 patients, of whom 14 (51.8%) used hormone replacement therapy for 5.6 ± 3.6 years. No recurrences or complications were observed in patients after HBSO with or without hormone replacement therapy.
Conclusion: Good clinical results can be obtained by performing only conservative surgery and/or HBSO without bowel resection, an alternative that could reduce the number of colorectal resections that are performed very frequently nowadays. After HBSO, patients may use hormone replacement therapy for several years with total satisfaction and well-being.

Keywords: deep infiltrating endometriosis, rectovaginal septum, bowel resection, colorectal, endometriosis

Creative Commons License © 2013 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.