Back to Browse Journals » Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine » Volume 2

International advocacy against DDT and other public health insecticides for malaria control

Authors Donald R Roberts, Richard Tren

Published Date January 2011 Volume 2011:2 Pages 23—30

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRTM.S16419

Published 20 January 2011

Donald R Roberts1, Richard Tren2
1Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA; 2Africa Fighting Malaria, Washington, DC, USA

Abstract: A new international effort to control/eradicate malaria is accompanied by suggestions that malaria can be controlled without the use of dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) and other insecticides. We review the underlying science of claims publicized by the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the United Nations Environment Programme, and the Stockholm Convention Secretariat (the Secretariat). Their claims stem from a $14 million GEF project that was conducted from 2003 to 2008 in Mexico and seven countries of Central America. Objectives, experimental design, analyses, and project accomplishments are described. So-called environmentally sound interventions (GEF interventions) that excluded insecticides were implemented in demonstration areas in eight countries. Efficacy of interventions was evaluated by comparing malaria rates in demonstration areas (n = 202) with those in control areas (n = 51), all in high malaria risk areas. There were no statistically significant reductions in malaria rates in demonstration areas compared with controls. This was true across all eight countries. Broad use of antimalarial drugs was the primary method of malaria suppression in the eight countries, but this method was not a GEF intervention. Ultimately statistics favoring efficacy of "environmentally sound" methods of malaria control were obtained by comparing malaria cases in demonstration areas for 2004 with cases in 2007, and we explain why these comparisons are not valid. In conclusion, claims that GEF interventions effectively reduced malaria in Mexico and seven countries of Central America are not supported by existing data or the results of epidemiological analyses. The claims are being used to justify the Secretariat's plan to eliminate DDT production by 2017. DDT is still needed for effective control of malaria, and its elimination could have significant consequences for people in malaria endemic countries.

Keywords: DDT, malaria control, Mexico, Central America, insecticides

Download Article [PDF] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Readers of this article also read:

The western diet and lifestyle and diseases of civilization

Pedro Carrera-Bastos, Maelan Fontes-Villalba, James H O’Keefe, et al

Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology 2011, 2:15-35

Published Date: 9 March 2011

Role of 5-HT2C receptor gene variants in antipsychotic-induced weight gain

Wallace TJM, Zai CC, Brandl EJ, Müller DJ

Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine 2011, 4:83-93

Published Date: 18 August 2011

Beta-amyloidolysis and glutathione in Alzheimer's disease

Lasierra-Cirujeda J, Coronel P, Aza MJ, Gimeno M

Journal of Blood Medicine 2013, 4:31-38

Published Date: 15 April 2013

Worsened hypertension control induced by aripiprazole

Yasui-Furukori N, Fujii A

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2013, 9:505-507

Published Date: 15 April 2013