-
Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Induction chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for symptomatic plasma cell myeloma – does it matter?
Mini-review
(1820) Views (786) Full article downloads
Authors: Henry C Fung, Sunita Nathan, John J Maciejewski
Published Date April 2010
Volume 2010:2 Pages 71 - 75
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S6258
Henry C Fung, Sunita Nathan, John J Maciejewski
Coleman Foundation Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Section of Bone Marrow Transplant and Cell Therapy, Division of Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Abstract: Autologous stem cell transplantation is the preferred treatment option for younger patients with symptomatic plasma cell myeloma. Most patients with newly diagnosed plasma cell myeloma receive 3–4 cycles of induction chemotherapy to achieve a level of disease control before proceeding to stem cell transplant. The ideal induction regimen for transplant-eligible patients shall allow more patients to proceed with transplant, rapidly and effectively control the disease, reverse disease-related complications, avoid early death, and is associated with minimal acute and long-term toxicities. Because of the concerns of potential damages to hematopoietic stem cells, alkylating agent regimens, specifically melphalan, are usually avoided for induction in transplant-eligible patients. Before the advance of immunomodulatory agents (IMiD) and proteasome inhibitors, the combination of vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (VAD) and variants were the most commonly used induction regimens. Recent reports as discussed in this review suggests that VAD is no longer the induction chemotherapy of choice for transplant eligible patients. Newer regimens incorporating IMiD and/or proteasome inhibitor into the induction regimen improve response rates and progression-free survival before and after the transplant and are evolving as the treatment of choice. Here, we review the available data on these newer induction regimens and to evaluate the potential impacts on the patient outcomes.
Keywords: plasma cell myeloma, induction chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation
Readers of this article also read:
Ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: its clinical potential
Evaluation of uptake and transport of cationic and anionic ultrasmall iron oxide nanoparticles by human colon cells
Current and future options for the management of phantom-limb pain
Can a feedback report and training session on medication counseling for general practitioners improve patient satisfaction with information on medicines?
Role of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin on freeze-dried and gamma-irradiated PLGA and PLGA–PEG diblock copolymer nanospheres for ophthalmic flurbiprofen delivery
The interactions between hemostasis and resistance training: a review
Hedgehog pathway as a drug target: Smoothened inhibitors in development
A scalable fabrication process of polymer microneedles
Natural killer cells: role in local tumor growth and metastasis
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- The benefits and risks of testosterone replacement therapy: a review
- Tenofovir-associated bone density loss
- Drug design with Cdc7 kinase: a potential novel cancer therapy target
- Development of mucosal adjuvants for intranasal vaccine for H5N1 influenza viruses




