skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

In search of parsimony: reliability and validity of the Functional Performance Inventory-Short Form

Original Research

(1419) Views  (624) Full article downloads

Authors: Nancy Kline Leidy, Ann Knebel

Published Date November 2010 Volume 2010:5 Pages 415 - 423
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S13389

Nancy Kline Leidy1, Ann Knebel2
1Center for Health Outcomes Research, United BioSource Corporation, Bethesda, MD, USA; 2Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA

Purpose: The 65-item Functional Performance Inventory (FPI), developed to quantify functional performance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), has been shown to be reliable and valid. The purpose of this study was to create a shorter version of the FPI while preserving the integrity and psychometric properties of the original.
Patients and methods: Secondary analyses were performed on qualitative and quantitative data used to develop and validate the FPI long form. Seventeen men and women with COPD participated in the qualitative work, while 154 took part in the mail survey; 54 completed 2-week reproducibility assessment, and 40 relatives contributed validation data. Following a systematic process of item reduction, performance properties of the 32-item short form (FPI-SF) were examined.
Results: The FPI-SF was internally consistent (total scale α = 0.93; subscales: 0.76–0.89) and reproducible (r = 0.88; subscales: 0.69–0.86). Validity was maintained, with significant (P < 0.001) correlations between the FPI-SF and the Functional Status Questionnaire (activities of daily living, r = 0.71; instrumental activities of daily living, r = 0.73), Duke Activity Status Index (r = 0.65), Bronchitis-Emphysema Symptom Checklist (r = -0.61), Basic Need Satisfaction Inventory (r = 0.61) and Cantril’s Ladder of Life Satisfaction (r = 0.63), and Katz Adjustment Scale for Relatives (socially expected activities, r = 0.51; free-time activities, r = -0.49, P < 0.01). The FPI-SF differentiated patients with an FEVl% predicted greater than and less than 50% (t = 4.26, P < 0.001), and those with severe and moderate levels of perceived severity and activity limitation (t = 9.91, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Results suggest the FPI-SF is a viable alternative to the FPI for situations in which a shorter instrument is desired. Further assessment of the instrument’s performance properties in new samples of patients with COPD is warranted.

Keywords: functional status, health outcomes, activities of daily living, COPD, patient-reported outcomes, chronic pulmonary disease, health-related quality of life






Readers of this article also read:
  • Journal Indexing

    See where all the Dove Press journals are indexed

  • Testimonials

    "You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio