skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Improving reporting of adverse drug reactions: Systematic review

Review

(4191) Views  (1128) Full article downloads

Authors: Mariam Molokhia, Shivani Tanna, Derek Bell

Published Date May 2009 Volume 2009:1 Pages 75 - 92
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S4775

Mariam Molokhia1, Shivani Tanna2, Derek Bell3

1Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; 2Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK; 3Division of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, with many being identified post-marketing. Improvement in current ADR reporting, including utility of underused or innovative methods, is crucial to improve patient safety and public health.

Objectives: To evaluate methods to improve ADR reporting via a systematic literature review.

Methods: Data sources were Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and National Library for health searches on ADR reporting (January 1997 to August 2007) including cross-referenced articles. Twenty-four out of 260 eligible studies were identified and critically assessed. Studies were grouped as follows: i) spontaneous reporting (11); ii) medical chart/note review (2); iii) patient interviews/questionnaires (3); and iv) combination methods including computer-assisted methods (8).

Results: Using computerized monitoring systems (CMS) to generate signals associated with changes in laboratory results with other methods can improve ADR reporting. Educational interventions combined with reminders and/or prescription card reports can improve hospitalbased ADR reporting, and showed short to medium term improvement.

Conclusions: The use of electronic health data combined with other methods for ADR reporting can improve efficiency and accuracy for detecting ADRs and can be extended to other health care settings. Although methods with educational intervention appear to be effective, few studies have reviewed long-term effects to assess if the improvements can be sustained.

Keywords: adverse drug reaction, reporting, ADR








Readers of this article also read:

Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Information technology in pharmacovigilance: Benefits, challenges, and future directions from industry perspectives
Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: the Danish National Pathology Registry and Data Bank
Health literacy and health seeking behavior among older men in a middle-income nation
Functional mobility and balance in community-dwelling elderly submitted to multisensory versus strength exercises
Retinal nerve fiber layer evaluation in multiple sclerosis with spectral domain optical coherence tomography
Erratum
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy
Children and young adults with parents with cancer: a population-based study
Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology