skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Improving health outcomes with better patient understanding and education

Review

(3076) Views  (1144) Full article downloads

Authors: Robert John Adams

Published Date October 2010 Volume 2010:3 Pages 61 - 72
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S7500

Robert John Adams
The Health Observatory, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Campus, The University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia, Australia

Abstract: A central plank of health care reform is an expanded role for educated consumers interacting with responsive health care teams. However, for individuals to realize the benefits of health education also requires a high level of engagement. Population studies have documented a gap between expectations and the actual performance of behaviours related to participation in health care and prevention. Interventions to improve self-care have shown improvements in self-efficacy, patient satisfaction, coping skills, and perceptions of social support. Significant clinical benefits have been seen from trials of self-management or lifestyle interventions across conditions such as diabetes, coronary heart disease, heart failure and rheumatoid arthritis. However, the focus of many studies has been on short-term outcomes rather that long term effects. There is also some evidence that participation in patient education programs is not spread evenly across socio economic groups. This review considers three other issues that may be important in increasing the public health impact of patient education. The first is health literacy, which is the capacity to seek, understand and act on health information. Although health literacy involves an individual’s competencies, the health system has a primary responsibility in setting the parameters of the health interaction and the style, content and mode of information. Secondly, much patient education work has focused on factors such as attitudes and beliefs. That small changes in physical environments can have large effects on behavior and can be utilized in self-management and chronic disease research. Choice architecture involves reconfiguring the context or physical environment in a way that makes it more likely that people will choose certain behaviours. Thirdly, better means of evaluating the impact of programs on public health is needed. The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework has been promoted as one such potential approach.

Keywords: self-management, health literacy, patient education, behavioral economics, program evaluation




 

Other articles by Dr Robert Adams



Readers of this article also read:

Public health measures during an anticipated influenza pandemic: Factors influencing willingness to comply
Evidence-based decision-making within the context of globalization: A “Why–What–How” for leaders and managers of health care organizations
The benefits and risks of testosterone replacement therapy: a review
The role of print advertising in clinical trial recruitment: Lessons from a South African site
Protecting children: a survey of caregivers’ knowledge of Georgia’s child restraint laws
Utilization of preventive care services and their effect on cardiovascular outcomes in the United States
Confidentiality of the medical records of HIV-positive patients in the United Kingdom – a medicolegal and ethical perspective
Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems
Threat of mass resignation as a window of opportunity for questioning hospital service production structures in Finland
Development of an indoor air quality checklist for risk assessment of indoor air pollutants by semiquantitative score in nonindustrial workplaces